Millions Are Leaving Islam Every Year

Repost from the old site.

It seems to be an article of faith that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. Another dubious fact is that Islam is the largest religion on Earth. Research shows that in fact Bahaism is the fastest growing religion on Earth, not Islam. True, Bahaism is a small religion compared to Islam, but facts are facts.

Well then, Islam is the biggest religion in the world then, correct? Apparently not. Wikipedia gives a worldwide Muslim population figure of 1.4 billion . Wikipedia also indicates that there about 2.1 billion Christians on Earth. That makes Christianity significantly larger than Islam.

Another “fact” that gets tossed around a lot is that Islam is so dangerous because it proselytizes so aggressively, and leaving Islam is so dangerous that “hardly anyone leaves Islam”. It is true that leaving Islam can be dangerous in many Muslim-majority lands. As we will see, many Muslims convert to Christianity in Russia and sub-Saharan African countries with non-Muslim majorities with little or no problems.

In recent years, according to Roman Silantyev, executive secretary of the Inter-religious Council in Russia, an incredible 2.5 million Muslims have converted from Islam to Orthodox Christianity in Russia, while only 2,500 Orthodox have converted to Islam (Orthodox Christians are less likely than the non-Orthodox to leave the flock).

Silantyev said that most of the converts are Muslims by birth who were non-practicing, while Muslims who regularly attend mosque rarely convert. He said that the conversions happen not so much due to proselytization, but instead due to the influence of the dominant Russian culture, which is Christian.

In particular, Silantyev noted that after the bestial crime of the Beslan School Massacre in North Ossetia, the number of Muslims in North Ossetia dropped by 50%. Whereas before Muslims were about 35% of North Ossetians, after Beslan, they numbered only about 17.5%. It appears that tens of thousands of Muslims may have accepted baptism after Beslan.

Silantyev stated that even Muslim sources acknowledge that after each major Muslim terrorist incident there, thousands, or possibly even tens of thousands of Muslims convert to Christianity. Although this blog supports the Chechen cause, the radical Islamists in Russia seem to be shooting themselves in the foot with their wanton terrorism.

The figures for Africa are even more amazing and come from impeccable Muslim sources who would be the last people on Earth to deceitfully propagandize huge numbers of Muslims converting out. The source is Sheikh Ahmad Al Katani, president of The Companions Lighthouse for the Science of Islamic Law in Libya, an institution that specializing in graduating imams and Islamic preachers.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, reprinted on the Chechen guerrilla Kavkaz Center website, Katani states, reprinted here and here , that in recent years, six million Africans, mostly sub-Saharan Blacks, leave Islam every year, mostly converting to Christianity, often evangelical Protestantism. Apparently few non-Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa are converting to Islam.

This anecdotal figure needs to be backed up by good research, but it is still intriguing. Muslims in Sub-Saharan Africa are definitely depressed about what they report as a declining Muslim population.

The problem is probably one of racism. African Muslims complain that the big money in the Muslim World (read: Gulf Arab money) simply does not go to Africa for the building of mosques and for employing Muslim workers to proselytize.

The reason? Gulf Arabs, and Arabs in general, are quite racist people, much more racist than most Westerners. In particular, Arabs dislike Blacks. There is a long tradition of Arabs enslaving Blacks in that part of the world. A typical word for Black person in Saudi Arabia is the same word that means “slave”.

Iraqis were particularly furious and insulted when Black US soldiers occupied their neighborhoods after the US invasion – they complained that it was particularly humiliating to be occupied by Blacks, who they saw as inferiors.

Things are more complicated in Egypt, where many Arab men want a (mulatto) woman, because they are seen as better in bed than an Arab woman (who would make a good mother but not necessarily a great mistress).

That tidbit from a mulatta Egyptian Muslim woman I was involved with for a while. Across the rest of the Sahel, Arabs continue to enslave Blacks in the same backwards tradition that has gone on for centuries.

In Sudan, Chad, Niger and Mauritania, Arabs enslave Black men and women. The conflict in Darfur, in addition to being a farmers versus herders conflict reminiscent of those fought in the US West in the 1800′s, is also rooted in the profound contempt Arab Sudanese have for their Black “slave” countrymen. It is this contempt that fuels the genocidal nature of the slaughter.

The Sahel Blacks are all Muslims, and Islam does not offer Sahel Blacks respite from the virulent racism of their Arab neighbors. Instead, the variety of Islam promoted by Sahelian Arabs emphasizes that divine nature of slavery laid out in the Koran, the better to justify their nasty habit of enslaving their Black countrymen.

This same Arab anti-Black racism is present in the Gulf Arabs that fund Islam around the world – hence they give scarcely a nickel to Black Africa. There, mosques crumble in disrepair, proselytization is almost nonexistent and the ummah melts away.

In the rest of the Muslim World, few Muslims leave the faith. Surely there must be millions of conversions to Islam every year, and the Muslim population in general is growing in part due to a generally higher birthrate compared to many non-Muslims. But the intriguing example of Russia and the anecdotal evidence of Sub-Saharan Africa show us that Islam is necessarily the one-way ticket it is made out to be.

46 Comments

Filed under Africa, Arab Racism, Arabs, Blacks, Christianity, Darfur, Eurasia, Homegrown Terrorism, Islam, Libya, North Africa, Orthodox, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, Reposts From The Old Site, Russia, Terrorism

46 responses to “Millions Are Leaving Islam Every Year

  1. Who would be silly enough to think Islam is the largest religion on earth?
    As far as Muslim converts go, most of the ‘new’ Muslims I’ve met are Latinos, Blacks, & ex-convicts (converted in US prisons). I think the rigid ‘structured’ format of rituals & codes of behavior in Islam appeals those who haven’t had much ‘structure’ in their lives.
    I’ve also met quite a few formerly Christian men & women who have married Muslims & converted (like me). Most seem to regret it.
    That’s one thing that has always puzzled me about Arab Muslims- the Quran stresses charity quite a bit – especially in regards to poor Muslims. Yet you very rarely see any substantial charitable efforts of rich Arab states towards their poorer Arab neighbors or non-Arab Muslims. I mean come on the famine in predominantly Muslim Somalia didn’t just ‘happen’ this has been brewing for quite a while- then there are their less fortunate Muslim brethren in Bosnia, Kashmir, Pakistan, Palestine, Dagestan, Chechen, Darfur, Kenya, Sub Sharan Africa etc. I was reading a UNICEF study the other day that reported that 60% of Muslim children worldwide die before the age of 5 yrs due to malnutrition, lack of sanitation & clean water.
    Go to Saudi Arabia & you may be shocked to see how many people are living in poverty. If you ask me I’d say Muslim Arabs are reverting to their pre-Islamic ways.

    • johnUK

      Islam is the fastest growing religion because they breed like rats.

      Billions go into Muslim “charities” which are well known terrorist fronts to finance jihad and start wars while portraying themselves as poor innocent Muslims.

      Muslims have gotten on the Jewish bandwagon as wanting the phoney Srebrenica massacre to instil false guilt on non-Muslims and justify aggressive war against the Serbs to be taught in British schools.

      If you ask me I’d say Muslim Arabs are reverting to their pre-Islamic ways.

      No Islam is an aggressive. backwards religion that creates poverty and inequality. Take away the oil revenue and the foreign expats that run these countries and they will all be like Egypt.

      • Well, JohnUK- what do you propose to do?
        Kill the 1.4 billion followers of Islam?
        Ban Islam entirely?
        Perhaps a reasonable solution would be to support more moderate forms of Islam?

        • johnUK

          Islam’s aggressive attitude and power lies in the US and Europe that has actively promoted and sponsored it.

          A mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and the US will solve that issue.

      • “Muslims have gotten on the Jewish bandwagon as wanting the phoney Srebrenica massacre…”
        Seperate the “Muslim” from it and you have a real massacre in Srebrenica, against the Bosnian people by the Serbs. You seem to have pathological and irrational hatred for the Muslims, so much that you can condone and deny a crime against humanity if it is against Muslims. You would have made a good Al Qaeda radical, if fate turned out that you were born in an Islamic society.

        • Dota

          Guys, I’m surprised you haven’t figured Johnny boy out yet. You aren’t supposed to take him seriously, you’re meant to laugh at him instead :)

        • johnUK

          @Atheist Indian

          The Srebrenica “research” is a US government controlled operation through International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) and before the alleged event Izetbegovic and Clinton meet in the Whitehouse to agree that about 5 thousand people would need to be killed in order to justify NATO intervention against Bosnian Serbs.

          http://slobodan-milosevic.org/news/smorch080710.htm

          http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25726

          http://www.juliagorin.com/wordpress/?p=2665

          Before Srebrenica the Bosnian regime was committing numerous false flag terrorist attacks to gain western sympathy and NATO intervention on behalf of the Bosnian Muslims.

          The only real Srebrenica massacre was the hundreds of Serb families killed by Muslim forces under Muslim warlord Nasir Oric who were using the UN safe zone as a base to launch attacks who were given repeated warning from Bosnian Serbs evenly entered the enclave to halt attacks.

        • johnUK

          @Dota

          You aren’t supposed to take him seriously, you’re meant to laugh at him instead.

          This from a person who follows the teachings of some paedophilic schizophrenic nut in the Mid East whose book if he even wrote it has been convicted of inciting genocide against non-Muslims in a US court.

          http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Wood/pedophile.htm

          David Icke’s Reptilian Moon Matrix theory looks rational in comparison.

        • @ johnUK
          I find it hard to be convinced by a site named slobadan-milesovic.org. It is like referring to Mein Kampf to prove Adolf Hitler’s innocence.

          The Srebrenica massacre happened. The Serbs massacred thousands of Bosniaks and vice versa. I am acquainted with a number of Bosniaks and Serbs, who lived there when it happened and lost close family members to the conflict. I am not going to discount that for some politically coloured conspiracy theory.

        • johnUK

          @Atheist Indian

          “I find it hard to be convinced by a site named slobadan-milesovic.org. It is like referring to Mein Kampf to prove Adolf Hitler’s innocence.”

          Well the puppet show trial in The Hague using false evidence, witnesses, etc could not charge him with a single crime so I guess you have top secret intel the intelligence community and investigator do not have.

          “The Srebrenica massacre happened.”

          Yes thousands of Serbs were killed provoking a Serbian backlash I agree.

          The Serbs massacred thousands of Bosniaks and vice versa. I am acquainted with a number of Bosniaks and Serbs, who lived there when it happened and lost close family members to the conflict. I am not going to discount that for some politically coloured conspiracy theory.”

          Yes it was a civil war where al sides in the conflict committed atrocities but the idea that Serbs launched an aggressive Greater Serbia project despite having the capability to take over Sarajevo in 24 hours is a fraud when Bosnian Muslim forces with US backing initiated the conflict.

          If we had a free media it would be pretty embarrassing for the Empire the revelations revealed during the Milosevic and Karadzic trial and connections to Islamic terrorism of the Izetbegovic regime including financing the 9/11 attacks.

        • “Well the puppet show trial in The Hague using false evidence, witnesses, etc could not charge him with a single crime…”
          Not quite. The trail went into a stalemate after the decease of Milesovic. Colonel Blagojevic and Radislav Krstic, who were more directly involved with the massacre, were convicted by the ICTY for the massacre. General Mladic, the commander of the force that led the massacre is still undergoing trial, which began in 2011 after his arrest.

          “Before Srebrenica the Bosnian regime was committing numerous false flag terrorist attacks to gain western sympathy and NATO intervention on behalf of the Bosnian Muslims.”
          The Bosniaks made the mistake of inviting Al Qaeda radicals for their nationalist struggle, a mistake most of them regretted after they realised just how savage and uncivilised the average Islamic radical is and how much venom Islamism can instill in their otherwise secular society. The Bosniaks, in my personal observation and those of others, are still among the most liberal and moderate Muslim societies on earth.

          “Yes thousands of Serbs were killed provoking a Serbian backlash I agree.”
          There is no convincing evidence who struck first. The Bosnians point fingers at the Serbs and the Serbs at Bosnians. I wouldn’t be as foolish to side with either, without concrete unbiased evidence. Eyewitness accounts point to a massacre of Bosniaks and their Serb sympathisers in Srebrenica, not the cause or motivators of the conflict.

        • If I am leading a revolutionary nationalist cause and the cause is joined by a terrorist organisation of international infamy, it does not dilute my cause except for those who opposed my cause initially and now found a scapegoat.

        • johnUK

          @Atheist Indian

          Not quite. The trail went into a stalemate after the decease of Milesovic. Colonel Blagojevic and Radislav Krstic, who were more directly involved with the massacre, were convicted by the ICTY for the massacre. General Mladic, the commander of the force that led the massacre is still undergoing trial, which began in 2011 after his arrest.

          No the trial went on for years and they could not get a single conviction against him so when he was nearer his release the thugs in The Hague had to kill him which he warned they would months prior.

          The ICTY uses ICMP data that does not determine or differentiate civilians from combat casualties or even the timing of when those people were killed.

          The Bosniaks made the mistake of inviting Al Qaeda radicals for their nationalist struggle, a mistake most of them regretted after they realised just how savage and uncivilised the average Islamic radical is and how much venom Islamism can instill in their otherwise secular society. The Bosniaks, in my personal observation and those of others, are still among the most liberal and moderate Muslim societies on earth.”

          Izetbegovic was convicted in a Yugoslav court with Hasan Cengic in 83 of trying to overthrow the Yugoslav government and install an Islamic state with the assistance of Iran who Bosnians have contact since the 80’s.

          The leader was an Islamic fundamentalist who in his own republished declaration said he wanted an Islamic state free of non-Muslims.

          As for peaceful moderate Bosnia it is still used as a recruitment and transit point for terrorist with Saudi NGO’s and other terrorist front organisations still operating in the country like the Madrid bombing and sending weapons and fighters to Iraq.

          “There is no convincing evidence who struck first. The Bosnians point fingers at the Serbs and the Serbs at Bosnians. I wouldn’t be as foolish to side with either, without concrete unbiased evidence. Eyewitness accounts point to a massacre of Bosniaks and their Serb sympathisers in Srebrenica, not the cause or motivators of the conflict.

          The Bosnian regime started the conflict by forming illegal armed units.

          It is a fact that the UN enclave was used by Orics forces to launch attacks against neighbouring Serb villages. Oric even bragged to a Canadian journalist of ethnically cleansing Serb villages.

          As for eyewitness accounts that amount to nothing as there have been cases of those alleged to have been killed still alive and the numerous fake Serbian rape and atrocity stories.

          ”If I am leading a revolutionary nationalist cause and the cause is joined by a terrorist organisation of international infamy, it does not dilute my cause except for those who opposed my cause initially and now found a scapegoat.”

          It does if there was already an agreement between all 3 sides and he reneged on that because he knew he could get more territory with backing from Uncle Sam if there was a war including using false flag terrorist events against his own population to illicit western backing on his behalf.

        • I know what I know, from first hand accounts of Bosniaks and Serbs themselves. Much that I try to see your point of view, the things you come up with sound less real and more like conspiracy theories.

          You seem to be obsessed with finding any and every way to make Muslims look like demons while anyone who attacks them is a saviour. It sounds like listening to Hitler talk about Jews.

        • johnUK

          @Atheist Indian

          It is not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy fact I was was reading and following the Milosevic trial while it was running.

          Eyewitness account don’t count for anything when they cannot be verified with facts especially when western PR firms where promoting Serbian atrocity stories in the mass media.

          “You seem to be obsessed with finding any and every way to make Muslims look like demons while anyone who attacks them is a saviour. It sounds like listening to Hitler talk about Jews.”

          That’s because they are setting the world on fire fight Uncle Sam’s wars with billions of dollars who are involved in major international organised crime like drug trafficking and the sex slave industry and are interlinked to a sole geopolitical agenda.

        • There is nothing irrational in hating islam.

    • just because they don’t give charity doesn’t mean they aren’t getting sin.like look at the point here whoever does’t give charity they’ll have to save for Allah in Resurrection day.

  2. johnUK

    Although this blog supports the Chechen cause

    Boooo!!!!

    Death to the Pan Turkic/Turanian imperialists.

    “It is true that leaving Islam can be dangerous in many Muslim-majority lands. As we will see, many Muslims convert to Christianity in Russia and sub-Saharan African countries with non-Muslim majorities with little or no problems.”

    It is a death penalty in Islam which we have seen attacks against Christians in Iraq and Egypt.

    Despite Muslims seeing the light and converting to Orthodox Christianity they still vastly outbreed ethnic Russians and have an immense ethnic supremacist mindset and group cohesion comparable to the Jews. It must be a Caucasus thing.

    In Chechnya there is a practice because they don’t believe in abortion of poorer Chechen women selling their babies to wealthier Chechen families.

  3. Religions in general are losing their hold on people, except those who have been socially or economically priviledged by religions. Visit a congregation (Dawah) of Islam and it sounds a lot like the preaching of a Jehovah’s Witness mass. A phoney sales pitch that offers nothing in this world that other faiths don’t and offers a playboy mansion in heaven with being able to prove that it exists (except the emphasis on faith that Koran is the word of god).

  4. Oh dear me, I was just reading the latest installment of the Homeland Security Act- the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
    I guess the US Constitution is now null & void completely. The US is now officially a dictatorship. I’ll spare you any further hyperbole but I certainly won’t be wearing my burka or hijab when I next visit the US. For kick & giggles peruse this-
    http://summerburkes.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/ndaa-1-653583143492.gif

    • johnUK

      Americans are so sheep like they do not need a NDAA bill which just shows how desperate the American regime is.

      Except from the false flag attack on 9/11 the terrorists are not very competent with the last major terrorist attack the New York car bomber using non-explosive fertiliser and the other being entrapment stings with FBI informers providing the material.

      • JohnUK-
        OK Mr Loonypants, whatever you say.
        I shan’t be using my degree in organic chemistry any time soon.

        • johnUK

          @Bibi

          “OK Mr Loonypants, whatever you say.”

          What that Americans are sheeple or that 9/11 was an inside job or do you believe a cave dwelling terrorist with health problems with no terrorist infrastructure in the US was able to carry out such a complicated operation?

          I shan’t be using my degree in organic chemistry any time soon.”

          I think you should stick to your career as a bin man as soon as you graduate from high school.

        • JohnUK-
          ‘I think you should stick to your career as a bin man as soon as you graduate from high school.’

          Ummm OK, sounds like you & Atheist Indian have a lot in common.
          Does ‘Bibi’ sound like the name of a man?
          Especially a ‘bin man’?
          I didn’t know they had WiFi in mental hospitals.

      • “Atheist Indian have a lot in common.”
        You know, I’m flattered. It is not everyday that I have a 40 year old woman with an indigo complex show such passionate interest in what I say.

    • Bhabiji

      “I’ll spare you any further hyperbole but I certainly won’t be wearing my burka or hijab when I next visit the US.”

      Good, we don’t want you to. But the larger question is why would you wear that … anywhere?

  5. johnUK

    The religion of peace strikes again.

    Swedish region of Malmö has become a criminal Muslim ghetto that postal workers are afraid to deliver mail there.

    http://www.thelocal.se/38496/20120113/

    Good serves the bastards right for supporting the Islamic genocide of Orthodox Serbs.

  6. Blissex

    «The problem is probably one of racism. [ ... ] Gulf Arabs, and Arabs in general, are quite racist people, much more racist than most Westerners. In particular, Arabs dislike Blacks. There is a long tradition of Arabs enslaving Blacks in that part of the world. A typical word for Black person in Saudi Arabia is the same word that means “slave”»

    Ass written that is correct, as all that is is an arab thing, rather than a Muslim one. Islam is mostly a fair non-racial faith (but a “closed” one), even if the religion has been contaminated inevitably by Arab tribalistic attitudes which were quite also widespread in Europe and the USA until recently (in centuries past european Christian women also wore the jihab for example, and old women in many european countries still do, at least at Mass).

    Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery only in the 1960s, but unofficially something close to it is still common, a bit like post-Reconstruction Dixie.

    «The conflict in Darfur, in addition to being a farmers versus herders conflict reminiscent of those fought in the US West in the 1800′s, is also rooted in the profound contempt Arab Sudanese have for their Black “slave” countrymen. It is this contempt that fuels the genocidal nature of the slaughter.»

    That’s yet another example of an ethnic based caste system motivated by a minority of conquerors (lighter skinned Arabs) ruling over a majority of conquered (dark skinned natives) people, where inter-caste marriage is effectively forbidden. Not too different from Dixie or ZA during apartheid, or much more ancient episodes.

  7. Xera

    What about when the darker skinned black nubians overthrew the lighter skinned rulers of Egypt and sort of established a system of their own?

    • Blissex

      It is not always lighter skinned conquerors and darker skinned conquered, and indeed (very rarely in recent times) the reverse has happened.

      But what matters is not really the color of the skin, it is the management and survival problem conquering minorities have in keeping down conquered majorities, and this often involves creating social dominance based on caste systems and ideological dominance based on religions that support caste systems. Even if sometimes the caste systems use skin color or other readily perceivable traits (for example height, hair color, accent in the UK) to accompany caste distinctions.

    • Blissex

      In particular the problem exists even when minority conquerors and majority conquered look similar, but still have different tribal backgrounds, as in many cases within Europe, but also cases elsewhere within say Africa, where the conquerors and conquered were often both dark skinned.

      Caste markers in the case of similar appearance then depend on less direct traits, for example Celts vs. Britons in ancient Great Britain, or English vs. Irish in more recent centuries. A to the latter consider this set of cartoons that could have been republished in several occasions or today with just the captions changed:

      http://irishstereotype.blogspot.com/2010/01/racism-anti-irish-cartoons.html

  8. Comrade V

    Yeah, I can attest to the fact that there is far less stigma attached to apostasy in Sub-Saharan African countries. I used to work with a guy from the Horn of Africa who converted from Islam to the Seven Day Adventists, of all things. He apparently had some sort of epiphany after reading “The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan,” or something. Apparently his parent (from what he told me) back in the mother country were completely unfazed by it.

    He also professed a belief in witchcraft to me as well ( or some aspects of it), a crime that people are often beheaded for in Salafiist Saudi Arabia. I’ve also noticed that a lot of Sub-Saharan African cultures will also meld their own syncretic beliefs into whatever denominational belief they belong to, such as combining animism with Evangelical Christianity.

    For example, he claimed that local witchdoctors back in his home country had the power to place curses and other maledictions on people whom they didn’t like. Though he may have been joking about this OTOH.

    • “Though he may have been joking about this OTOH.”
      You will find it funny, but a lot of people in some cultures actually believe in this stuff, even educated ones. In India for example, witchcraft is usually blamed when a husband or wife is caught cheating on their partner. “I was bewitched” is a better defence than “I was swayed by lust”. At other times, illness and poisoning is also attributed to witchcrafts, when the doctors are too incompetent to diagnose the real problem (= since the all-knowing doctor is clueless, it must be witchcraft.)

      • Comrade V

        Yes, pretty outrageous. But at the same time, Europe was far worse than this prior to the 18th century and beyond.
        Also, the guy I was referring to was in training to become a researcher as well. It’s not like he was the village idiot or anything. Another whopper I have heard was when an Ethiopian bloke tried to tell me that Westerners invented the AIDS bloke as a method of keeping the black man down. Not religious exactly, but still a nutty belief in similar vein.

  9. Bhabiji

    “Repost from the old site. It seems to be an article of faith that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world.”

    Bwahahahahahahaha! Hello Buddhism!

    Islam is fastest growing only if you count infants born to muslim parents as muslim. Who knows what they’ll be when they grow up and can decide for themselves.

    As far as adult converts, its Buddhism all the way baby.

    Take that you Bamiyan Buddha killers! At least the Egyptian muzzies have some general respect for their ancient heritage ($$$$$).

    I wish someone would revive colonialism.

  10. secular against cult

    The biggest threat to humanity is secularism which forbids people to think and talk against a religion and stop them from recognising its not even a religion its a cult !

  11. F

    “Silantyev said that most of the converts are Muslims by birth who were non-practicing, while Muslims who regularly attend mosque rarely convert. ”

    When is people to get that NOBODY IS BORN A MUSLIM? People are born with any particular faith, and any other ideas for that matter. This is simply sloppy thinking!

    Regards.
    F

  12. i feel very happy when ever i heard about Muslims leaving ISLAM, if this figure of 60 million Muslims leaving Islam every year is true then i hope one day lives of those people will be better because then these people can think do some thing worth doing rather then offering namaz 5 times a day.

  13. submitter

    figures are showing islam had bypass Catholicism. and conversion of christian priests and scholars to muslims are aiding the spread of islam.

  14. Islam is evil, and our government is eroding it from the world

  15. is not it possible, you want that in our America, with freedom were dirty whores in hijabs

  16. In Africa, 6 million Muslims accept Christianity

  17. in the United States only 3000000miliona Muslims, our task is to make them less

    • Lady Matilda

      I think the first thing is that Buddhism is clearly the second biggest religion. With over 1.7 billion adherents this is obvious. Buddhists do not boast about such figures and that is the reason one never hears about this. China though a communist country greatly reveres the old ways when it comes to their way of life and put in the rest of Asia and we end up with such a huge figures quite easily.

      Second, it is true that in some countries like Indonesia, Iran and the Russian influenced areas people leave Islam in quite large numbers. The numbers for Indonesia are in the two million plus region and they even put out a video called Save Marayam on the net to stem this flow; and this is where this figure of two million comes from.

      Now on to the fast birthrate; but then there is the slow muslim birth rate in places like Turkey, Iran and Tunisia. These countries will have elderly populations in no time at all. Indeed in Iran they face the fastest demographic collapse in history. Now let us look at the general picture on Islamic demographics.

      By 2050, according to the latest UN projections, the population growth rate of the Muslim world will converge on that of the United States. So one needs to keep in mind that demographic rates do not go up forever. Indeed today Sub saharan Africa has the highest demographic rates of growth and of course the majority of the births recorded there are Christian.

      Based on conversions it could be argued that Christianity is the fastest growing religion in the present and also in the long term whereas Islam’s window of opportunity is shrinking daily as the demographic rates catch up with those of the west.

      And then there is Buddhism. Buddhism will embrace its militant wing in response to Islamic jihad. We see this in Burma. We see it in Shri Lanka.

      And then there is Central Asia where Islam meets Secular states who impose harsh restriction on the practice of Islam. Indeed in some states such as Uzbekistan it is against the law for minors to go the Mosque. In such states and I include the whole of the post soviet states of central Asia it is a safe bet that Islam is dead and about to go into the oblivion of history within a few decades. China is now following the same policies that have worked so well in this area but are introducing the Han Chines into the mix to demographically win this battle as well. From five percent to forty five percent the Han Chinese are set to become the majority in Uighur areas to the east of the country.

      Finally, the Jihad of today is financed by petro-dollars. Again this window is shrinking. Oil does not last forever. Oil is like money in the bank. Once you spend it, it is gone forever. Saudi is projected to stop exporting oil as early as 2030 and that means the militias will begin fighting for the control of the Saudi lands during the next decade or so. We live in interesting times.

      In any case the upshot of this is that the future of Islam is demographically and financially one of constraint and decline. And with no central strong state like China or America or Russia to hold the reigns of power the already fragmented Islamic world will go further down the well trodden path of rioting, militias, beheading, stoning women to death etc. We see all this today and the future is the same but even more desperate; as desperate times call for desperate measures. And with the muslims that usually means more Islam:Islam is the solution!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s