Why Game Unfolded

Here.

I have been really afraid to read this guy’s blog because it’s big on the MRA sites, and the misogyny there is something fierce. However, when I saw “happily married” up at the top, I brightened up. So how much does he hate women anyway if he’s happily married? How much could his wife object to his stuff? Forget it. I started feeling better already.

More or less everything Dalrock writes here is correct. I only object to the second paragraph where he seems to be digging at progressives.

One of the most interesting parts of the post was where he talked about the deal that social conservatives struck with the feminists:

However, in the case of the gender war feminists have made an unspoken agreement with traditional conservatives:

You hold him down while I rob him.

Maybe so, maybe so. All I know is that recently, I have been accused of being a “woman-hater.” It’s an odd slam, and it’s not just the usual feminist idiots saying that. A lot of this is coming from conservative men, especially the Obama-hating, Tea Party, Fox News crowd.

WTF! Gender feminist Republican neocons? Sounds like something so horrible only a mad scientist could have cooked it up.

This made no sense to me until I discussed it with Ferd at In Mala Fide. He calls them “femiservatives” and says they are everywhere now.

This is just sad. If there was one good thing about conservatives, it was standing up to the pussification of society and the related end of honor based society, the war on men and boys, the increasingly insane agenda of feminism, etc. Now the conservatives have thrown in their lot with the gender feminists. Say it ain’t so, Joe!

The post goes on in some interesting directions. The demands of feminists were certainly reasonable, and we can agree with many of their demands. And it looks like, at this late date, the feminists simply won. They got most of their demands. The war, in terms of oppressed females making demands on male oppressors – Women’s Liberation – is pretty much through in the US. The women won, they got theirs, much of what they got was their due, and we should not begrudge them.

Nevertheless, as wise men point out, there are always consequences to revolutionary change, and Women’s Liberation was indeed part of a revolutionary movement (speaking from one who was on the ground and there at the time).

Then along comes Game, Roissy and Roosh with another option altogether to the shitty world that the feminists and social cons left men.

Feminists and Traditional Conservatives gave men lemons; Roissy and Roosh taught them how to make lemonade.

Yes! There is another way! As Dalrock points out, this was in the cards, and it had to be.

Who reading this doesn’t understand that this was absolutely bound to happen? Why is anyone surprised at this? After 40 years of cumulative one sided demands (and concessions), men now see another option.

Feminists and Traditional Conservatives are furious. How dare they choose something else! But they are the ones who turned marriage from a lifetime partnership to a way women can defraud men. They are the ones who told women to slut it up in their 20s and told men to wait for marriage until the women were done. They were the ones who denigrated the status of husband from leader of the family to cowering scapegoat.

All I can say is they should get used to it. If it took 40 years of one sided demands to get here, it could easily take as long to move back to equilibrium (assuming it does).

Well of course. You all couldn’t see this coming? How did you expect men to react? Come on.

From men’s point of view, it’s a crap deal. Men can either cower and suck up the raw deal, or they can fight back in their own way. And the way men are fighting back makes every bit as much sense as the motivations of the feminists that set it off in the first place. Demands spur reaction and counterdemands. The oppressed turn tables on oppressors and become the new oppressors and oppress those who used to dominate them. The newly dominated fight back. The Slave Rebellions never end, only the teams change, and one Slave Rebellion leads to another.

Feminists said to men, “Here, have this shit sandwich I made just for you. You need to eat because you were bad forever and ever. And while you’re eating away on it for the rest of your life, I am going to the party of the century for the rest of my life. While I’m there, I’m going to fuck all your friends and laugh and tell them what a loser you are. You got my back, right, my friend?” She winks, and she’s off.

The manginas, pussies, social cons, feminist men and other morons have been munching away on the shit sandwich forever now, smiling and saying, “Boy, this tastes so good! Yum! Thanks ladies for your culinary skills!”

You see them munching away and stop, amazed.

“How long are you guys going to keep eating that sandwich?” you ask.

“Forever!” they smile.

You shake your head and walk away to their nearest MRA – MGTOW – Game bar on the Internet. Here they serve all sorts of things; some taste good and others don’t taste so good, but a man gets to retain his honor when he leaves.

And shit sandwiches are definitely not on the menu.

13 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Feminism, Gender Studies, Man World, Political Science, Politics, Psychology, Republicans, Romantic Relationships, US Politics

13 Responses to Why Game Unfolded

  1. Oh Robert,
    When are you going to learn? The Feminazi/Femiservatives don’t want women to be treated EQUALLY as men, they want women to be treated BETTER than men.
    Simple, no?

  2. Pimp

    I have to say, I have a bit of a nuanced position on all of this. While I certainly agree that the female supremacists who call themselves feminists are evil and a bunch of liars, I also consider myself to be a submissive and sensitive man. I don’t appreciate being called a “mangina” for not being close enough to a stereotypical man. I even used to consider myself a feminist until I started paying close attention to the movement. Yeah, that’s my fault and I take full responsibility for it. It’s sort of like the pseudoskeptic movement. The promotion of reason, rationality, critical thinking and all of that other stuff that they say that they’re about is great…until you realize that they are lying and don’t care about any of that stuff, in reality. I guess the point that I’m getting at is that while I agree with a lot of your criticisms of the female supremacist movement I don’t think that it necessarily follows that you should criticize men who are non-stereotypical.

    • I’m very much a nonstereotypical guy myself, take it from me. Hell,a lot of people insist I must be gay! They don’t just think I’m gay, they know it! They don’t even believe me when I tell them I’m not.

      So I have nothing against guys like that. and I’ve always been a feminist. I used to be a member of NOW! OTOH, I am starting to have second thoughts. And I am definitely for the guys all right.

      The manginas are the guys who are for the women in the war between men and women. They are the cock blockers, the Captain Save a Ho’s and the White Knights. It’s bullshit. Line up with your Brethren. Bros before hos. We are all in this together.

      Note that the post didn’t even bash feminists. I said that I understand their desires completely, and I sympathize with their goals. OTOH, there was bound to be some sort of a pushback. And it’s obvious to me that Women’s Liberation, (Which I was a part of, remember?) has unleashed a monster from Holy Hell. If I would have known it was going to end up like this, I never would have backed Liberation in the first place. My Mom’s generation had a better idea.

      • Pimp

        I guess I see what you’re saying. I wish that it didn’t have to be a war, though. Sometimes I have been on the side of SOME women against SOME men. Maybe I’m a partial “mangina.” Then again, I understand that there is an argument to be made that most women will not allow real coexistence. I have heard the term “mangina” used to mean anyone who is not stereotypical, before, so thanks for clarifying what you meant.

        • It is a war, that’s one thing you have to figure out. They want one thing, and we want another. I have female friends and of course I take their sides sometimes against some of the bullshit that males have put them through – like out and out date rape for instance – I know a woman who got raped when she was passed out drunk.

          The manginas are with the feminists. The ALWAYS take the woman’s side, automatically, every single time. We are ALWAYS wrong, and the women are always right. It sucks. Of course I sort of got this message from my own parents, including my Mom. But it figures she sides with her gender. I just figure my Mom is wrong a lot when it comes to women. It really is a war, and my own Mom is on the other side a lot. That sucks, but it makes sense.

        • I don’t think you’re a partial mangina at all. Listen to my argument a bit and see if you want to be a mangina. NO YOU DO NOT.

          There is nothing more idiotic than the mangina: “Women get to get away with murder. Men get to get away with nothing.” It’s crap, and I honestly don’t believe that you really think that way.

          Is this the way most women think? Of course they do. But why should men think that way? Fuck that.

        • Pimp

          Yeah, I’ll agree that there is a war on with most women. Most women are cunts. However, if we could figure out some way to see to it that the few good ones survive, reproduce, and pass their opinions on to the future, then the war could be over. Sort of like a directed evolution.

        • I don’t think you understand, Pimp. Women want one thing, and men want another. Even with the women you love most, it’s a war in a sense. That’s the dilemma. I don’t think you are understanding me.

          Women want one thing, and men want another. That’s what I call “war.” It’s completely natural, there’s no getting away from it really.

        • Pimp

          I think that I understand you, but I just disagree, somewhat.

  3. I think it’s more accurate to say that the feminists won, and the women lost.
    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2011/05/feminism-stupid-or-evil-or-both.html

  4. Bay Area Guy

    Feminists said to men, “Here, have this shit sandwich I made just for you. You need to eat because you were bad forever and ever. And while you’re eating away on it for the rest of your life, I am going to the party of the century for the rest of my life. While I’m there, I’m going to fuck all your friends and laugh and tell them what a loser you are. You got my back, right, my friend?” She winks, and she’s off.

    The manginas, pussies, social cons, feminist men and other morons have been munching away on the shit sandwich forever now, smiling and saying, “Boy, this tastes so good! Yum! Thanks ladies for your culinary skills!”

    LOL

    So true though!

    You would be surprised at how many manginas and pathetic girly men there really are.

    • Check out cock blocking, White knighting, Captain Save a Ho’s. They’re everywhere. Mangina White knight BS is just another way to get laid for these guys. Side with the women against the bad men, and that way we can get laid. They’re just trying to get laid just like all the rest of us, but they are siding with the enemy to do so. Traitors.

  5. Pingback: Why Game Unfolded: The Shit Sandwich | SNY Ideas

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s