Distribute widely and spread the news.
Search “Wikipedia” on the search button on this blog for more info on the most corrupt encyclopedia ever made.
Distribute widely and spread the news.
Search “Wikipedia” on the search button on this blog for more info on the most corrupt encyclopedia ever made.
I have spoken to Americans who were alive during WW2. Knowing that most US Whites were racists back then, I expected that many of these racist Whites supported the Nazis. Whites who were alive in that era frowned and told me that I was dead wrong.
Overwhelmingly, White America was almost 100% anti-Nazi. This included even racist Whites. Most Whites were at least somewhat racist back in those days. Many were really racist. But nevertheless, they almost all of them hated the Nazi Darth Vaders. Even down South, those racist crackers almost punched each other out to get in line to kill the Nazi monster.
Many racist Southerners proudly served on the European Front, and many were wounded and died. Those who came back got heroes’ welcomes. Later on, those who lamented that they had fought on the wrong side were few and far between.
Why were the Nazis so hated? In part because they had declared war on and attacked almost all of White Europe. Many Americans had British ancestry and they were particularly infuriated, and even sickened, by the Nazi assault on the UK.
Others had French, Polish, Russian, Norwegian, Greek, Yugoslav, Czech, Ukrainian, Belgian, Dutch or Danish ancestry. The Nazi criminals overran all of these great White countries for no reason, massacring any White man, woman or child who stood in their path.
Further, though Americans were anti-Semitic, they were sickened by the rumors of what the malign Nazis were doing to the Jews. We were not that nice to Jews, and there was discrimination, but we never mass murdered them for Chrissake. Most Americans simply thought that Nazis were sick freaks.
One more thing. Nazi beasts were totalitarian, and Americans loved democracy. In addition, Americans had heard of Nazi monsters murdering the physically and mentally disabled, and this sickened them to the core. We may have sterilized a few such folks, but we never mass-murdered them.
On top of everything else, the Nazi Orcs declared war on our proud nation only four days after Pearl Harbor. They declared war on us before we could declare war on them.
Most Americans did not see Nazis as “pro-White.” Why should they? They lived in an America that was already as pro-White as you can get.
If White nationalists have fucked up in one way more than any other all across the globe, it’s in their embrace of the Nazi enemy. Even their Holocaust Denial makes most Americans want to puke their guts up. Especially here in the US, none of that’s ever going to go down well. Neither will it go down in Yugoslavia, Denmark, Norway, the UK, Greece, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Ukraine, Australia, Canada or New Zealand.
He starts off with a comment on his site by me.
I think you and the like are blazing an interesting path on the outskirts of a pro-White consciousness that avoids the extremes of White nationalism and the like. The POV that you and your ilk are propounding here could quite possibly go over in a big way with a huge % of US Whites. Whereas White nationalism is essentially an extremist, fanatical and racist dead-end.
I have the feeling that most US Whites are not racist, but they are still proud to be White, don’t want to see White culture die, and are distressed by hate crimes, discrimination and hate propaganda directed at them. Someone needs to speak for these people.
He then goes on to elaborate a line that is similar to mine in Who Will Speak For Them? In particular, he discusses his disdain for the rampant Nazism, pro-Nazism and anti-Semitism in the pro-White movement. He suggests that poison does not resonate with most US Whites, thank God. I agree with him.
Anti-racism in a pro-White movement ought to be a no-brainer. One of the things that pro-Whites are always complaining about is discrimination, hate crimes and hate propaganda against Whites. In other words, racism against Whites.
Well, if we oppose racism against us, we can’t very well support it against others, now can we? The reason we hate it is because racism feels bad. Anti-White racism feels bad to White people. It hurts us and makes us angry.
Well, guess what? Guess how anti-Black and anti-Hispanic racism feels to Blacks and Hispanics? Same way anti-White racism feels to us. It hurts them and makes them feel angry. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If anti-White racism is wrong (And we say it is.) than all, or most all, other forms of racism are too. You know, a 5th grader could easily figure that, but it seems to escape most pro-Whites.
Now, that doesn’t mean we have to buy into the PC insane version of anti-racism floating around. It isn’t so much anti-racism as it’s just anti-White hate propaganda. We can set up our own definitions of racism, and I think we should.
We can say, first of all, that race realism is not necessarily racist. Nor is wanting to have control over our borders, for Chrissake. Nor is wanting to toss out however many million illegal immigrants on their asses. Nor is setting up our immigration policy any damn way we see fit. Nor is choosing to or not to date, sleep with and marry any ethnicity we choose. If we have any right to ethnic selectivity, it is over the most private of our behaviors.
Along the same lines, we have a right to find attractive or nonattractive any ethnicities or phenotypes. We have a right to feel proud of our ethnicity and our culture. We have a right to fight back against the discrimination, hate crimes and hate propaganda that harms us.
We have a right to open up a debate about whether “diversity is our strength” is a truth or a lie. We have a right to demand a slowdown in immigration, at least until we can assimilate the gazillions of non-assimilating immigrants already here.
And we have an absolute right, like all sane countries do, to demand that the immigrants already here assimilate as quickly as possible. I will even say, outrageously, that we have a right to engage in White Flight and put our kids in private schools if need be. Sane people flee crappy neighborhoods and schools. It’s outrageous to call this straight-up sane behavior racism.
And we can stand up and shout loudly that none of this is racism. And we can be clear in our conscience when we say that.
What we ought to oppose is Whites treating most any group of non-Whites, or especially individual non-Whites, in a harmful or discriminatory fashion. There are plenty of great folks out there of all races, and as long as they behave as well as we expect our White friends to behave, we have no right whatsoever to hate them, or really even to treat them even 1% less well, due to their mere genetics.
I don’t know Guy White’s stance very well, but I like what I see so far.
Going along with previous posts in which I link to many great maps of Afghan provinces and districts on this site, this post will link to some really great maps of Israel and Palestine. One is even a great map of South Lebanon. Good maps of Israel and Palestine are pretty hard to find online. Most of the good ones are hard copies and they want you to shell out cash to buy them.
To be honest, these are not really maps of Israel proper. The focus here is on maps of the settlements in the West Bank. There is one map of Jerusalem that shows the walls walling off many of the Palestinian communities there. The map of North Israel/South Lebanon does have some detail of North Israel.
But this is an anti-Zionist blog, so it’s appropriate that most of the maps are of the settlements. Truth be told, good maps of the settlements are not even that easy to find, and good maps of South Lebanon are scarce indeed.
Map of the Occupied Territories with focus on areas of Israeli control and areas of PA control. Shows the Apartheid Wall and how much Palestinian land has been lost by it.
Extremely detailed map of Israeli settlements in the West Bank from B’tselem.
This is an email that has been making the rounds for sometime now. It starts out saying that this was Micheal Richards’ defense in court on charges that he engaged in a racist tirade during his comedy act. I’m not sure if that is true.
I originally got this from a Texan guy, now tragically deceased, who was not a White nationalist by any stretch of the imagination. I don’t even think he was all that racist. He was just a typical White man from Texas. This last time I got it from a friend of mine, a Southerner originally from Arkansas. She’s anything but a White nationalist, and she’s actually about 1/4 Cherokee like so many White Southerners. She’s not a racist at all in my book.
Surely White nationalists and other such types rejoice over an email like this, but it’s clearly speaking to quite a few angry Whites in America. It is a WN screed? Not really. What is it arguing for? Equal rights. And that the Identity Politics so embraced by non-Whites be granted to Whites. It also takes a few swings at often-hypocritical Black rage against Whites.
White ethnocentrism is kind of a hidden beast. Most Whites don’t really have the hatred or indifference towards themselves that PC brainrot demands. White ethnocentrism is just sort of this suppressed thing that can sometimes simmer up towards the surface.
There’s a reason we don’t have United White College Fund, White holidays and White Entertainment Television. All of these things would be immediately swarmed on and overrun by the White nationalists and neo-Nazis. David Duke would be the lead emcee on WET. Don Black would ecstatically head up UWCF. White holidays would be full of marches with skinhead assholes, and shitheads with runes, Celtic crosses and worse.
Sooner or later, WET would be taken off the air. UWCF would probably be put under federal investigation, and most sane cities would ban White holidays outright as a threat to the peace.
There is still this vast reservoir of White ethnocentrism and anger out there, simmering right below the surface. These Whites are mostly not racist at all (not in my book anyway), anymore than anyone else who wants equal rights. 73% of US Whites say they are proud to be White, and that White civilization is worth saving. The overwhelming majority of these folks recoil in horror at the White nationalists and worse.
Who will speak for them? Who will speak for the normal, non-racist Whites angry enough to pass this email along? The White nationalists are crazies, dripping with furious hatred and racism, so they can never speak to normal White people.
Who will then?
Who will speak for them?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me ‘White boy,’ ‘Cracker,’ ‘Honky,’ ‘Whitey,’ ‘Caveman’… and that’s OK..
But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink .. You call me a racist.
You say that Whites commit a lot of violence against you… so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP. You have BET…If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we’d be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month, we’d be racists.
If we had any organization for only Whites to ‘advance’ OUR lives, we’d be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that??
A White woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.
If we had a college fund that only gave White students scholarships…You know we’d be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US …Yet if there were ‘White colleges’, that would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you’re not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our White pride, you call us racists.
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud… But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only Whites can be racists??
That’s why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country. We won’t stand up for ourselves!
BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!
It’s not a crime YET…but getting very close!
Three hours ago, at around 8 AM PST, the Leftist President of Honduras, Mel Zelaya, was ousted in a military coup, and the ambassadors of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua were apparently kidnapped.They’ll be lucky if they end up alive. Venezuela is threatening military action, but nothing will come of that. The Venezuelan ambassador was reportedly beaten and left by a roadside.
Cell phones are not working all through Honduras, and the government has taken over all TV and radio stations. Power has been cut to independent media stations. Sort of like in Iran, you know! Obviously not one word of this from the scum US media. But we can wall to wall headlines about the same shit in Iran. Why? Honduras is not a threat to Israel.
I never even knew that Honduras had elected a Leftist, news to me. That’s always been one of the most backwards and wrecked countries in the whole region, but the inherent conservatism of the people has always prevented the proper armed revolutionary that the system necessitated.
There was a revolutionary band organized in 1983 by an expat US Irish Catholic priest, but it never got much done, and was quickly annihilated by the US and the Honduras government. Death squads roamed the place during the 1980′s and maybe 300-400 people were murdered. The US military set up a bunch of huge bases there, the place was overrun by actual and de facto CIA agents.
Honduras was just as much of a stinking sewer as ever, but at least it had the full guns of the US military to enforce the armed project of turning a fertile tropical land into a stinking imperialist-wrecked toilet of a country.
There were supposedly some leftwing bands running around later in the 1980′s and early 1990′s but no one knew if they were real or not. Some said they were just false flag fronts run by the Honduran military. The FMLN in El Salvador (I used to buy guns for them) used to run some guns through Honduras via Morazon Province, where one of their big strongholds was.
The military and the rich have always run the show here. It’s no surprise that the democratically elected Leftist President was tossed out in a military coup. That’s always been the way it works down there, and it’s why people like me reject the “democratic elections” way to power. It’s useless. You’re only going to get ousted by a coup.
The only way is armed revolution that defeats the army of the ruling class and transforms it into a people’s army. Even then you have to deal with the inevitable contras. It’s a conundrum all right, but maybe Sendero Luminoso is only something. Maybe parliamentary cretinism is just that.
Of course, the scum US media, including my vile “Leftist” radio station, never told me anything about this. All they told me that was that the evil “Leftist” President was trying to set up a “rogue referendum”. Turns out that is some referendum to amend the constitution to allow him to run again.
Zelaya had proposed to turn the wicked US Santo Cano military base in Honduras over to peaceful purposes, thereby evicting the US military. It was from this base that Jacobo Arbenz of Guatemala was overthrown in 1954. It was from here that the Contra War and support for the Salvadoran and Guatemalan counterinsurgencies was run during the 1980′s and early 1990′s. That US military base is pretty much just a gigantic blots of Evil on the neotropical landscape.
While he is at it, Zelaya should have evicted the US Embassy. I’ve heard about that Embassy from people with good knowledge of the place. Just about every human in US Embassy in Tegucigalpa is working for the CIA or US military intelligence.
It’s hard to believe that the US government did not have something to do with this coup.
The rest of the government opposed the referendum, and I guess they feared the power of the people. The Supreme Court had apparently said that the referendum was illegal. The conflict is because, incredibly enough, the Constitution does not even allow parts of it to ever be changed by any means! This was the basis for the Supreme Court’s rejection of the referendum. But Zelaya’s referendum was going to be non-binding anyway, so what’s the deal?
Stupid me, I thought it was just Leftist tin pot dictators in banana republics again. I would say I won’t get fooled again! But I will, of course.
I admit I got up for a few hours in there. I am wondering if that is a good idea? Is it bad for you? Damn, it sure was fun. I need to do this more often.
Thomas Pynchon is a notoriously reclusive American author. He has hardly been photographed in the past 50 years. He is presently 72 years old, if you can believe that. There are photos floating around, some claiming to be Thomas Pynchon, and others saying they are not Thomas Pynchon. It is important to sort out the real from the fake here.
Below is not a picture of Thomas Pynchon.
There is a story behind the fake photo, but we need to go the Internet Archive to find it, else it’s lost to history.
A South African journalist decided to track down Pig Bodine. He had heard that Tyrone Slothrop was living in New York, married to a literary agent named Victoria Wren, a descendant of Teddy Roosevelt. He had a young son named Gottfried.
The reporter went to work. It turned out that Benny Profane could be located via a popular online service that claims to find anyone.
The reporter soon located all of the Mucho Maases in the US and finally found one of them in the Manhattan.
It gave a Manhattan address for one Wicks Cherrycoke.
He decided that writers are creatures of habit and that Pirate Prentice would probably pick his son up at school after school let out. He tracked down the school of Pointsman’s son and it turns out that it let out at 3:05 PM.
The journalist quickly recognized Roger Mexico’s tall, ungainly frame as a man walking hand in hand with his young won. The journalist had previously spoken to old lovers and friends of Captain Blicero, including Chrissie Jolly, now married to a Texas oil executive. She drew a sketch of what Herbert Stencil must look like now, based on her recollections.
The journalist snapped Kurt Mondaugen’s photo, and Fausto Maijstral freaked out. He ran across the street, holding his arm in front of his face. The journalist pursued him down the street, getting no more pics, and finally proferred his hand. Finally, Franz Pökler turned around and bellowed, “I don’t like my picture taken!”
All that trouble, and what he got is, of course, not a picture of Thomas Pynchon at all. It’s a photo of so many other folks, most of whom only walk the pages of bound books, but it’s certainly not a photo of the secretive master himself. Ah, the travails of journalist as paparazzi.
Now I just love serial killers. I mean, from a fan’s point of view. I read about them obsessively.
I just had a dream last night where I went to a dentists’ office and they gave you a test with two vases. Each vase had some statements on it. If you agreed with the statements on one vase, you were a potential serial killer. If you agreed with the statements on the other vase, you were a nice person.
Of course, I agreed with the statements on the serial killer vase, because they were just normal statements to me. The statements on the nice person vase were wimpy and lame, like nice people are supposed to be.
The receptionist gave me a distrusting look after I scored “serial killer” on the test, but then I protested that I was not a serial killer. Instead, I was just a serial killer fan. I read about them obsessively to the point where it’s almost not healthy. I watch TV and movies about them. I’ve even gone to their trials and sat in the audience and smiled with all the other weirdos. She gave me this half-smile that said that might be ok.
This is actually part of serial dream that I have. Characters, locations, themes, dates, themes, plots, you name it, it’s all part of a continuing Goddamned series. This dream series has been going on for many years. We are now on the 822nd episode or something for some dreamshows. Most of these people and places only exist in Dreamworld, and for all I know only exist there.
What’s weird is that the dreamshows remember all the old ones, and there are constant references to the old shows, the way a comprehensive TV series ought to build on itself.
One of the themes of my dreams is how I’m probably really an evil scumbag lowlife Worst Person On Earth deep down inside, even though I’ve never really done anything. Then a lot of the dream deals with my guilt over being so Evil, other people’s perceptions of my Evilness, my attempts to explain to them that I’m not really Evil, etc.
Anyway, it always bothered me, as proud White man, that all these Black haters were hating on my people by saying we were more likely to be serial killers. Blacks may be ghetto, welfare, pimpin’, whorin’, gangbangin’ street thugs and all, but it takes a White man to do the Ultimate Evil.
Further, there was a defensive line among Whites that said that serial killers are criminal geniuses with high IQ’s, and as we all know that “niggers* ain’t got no brains”, of course they’re too stupid to be Ted Bundys. As an integrationist, I object. If anything is in need of racial democratization, it’s the psychos! Why should the White Man carry the Burden of the serial killer torch all alone?
For that reason, I love me some Black serial killers!
From the comments section, Uncle Milton responds to a Black guy who disputed that Blacks were more likely to be serial killers than Whites with the typical Black line about serial killers, that is, that they are mostly Whites.
That’s followed by an essay by the great Earl Ofari Hutchinson.
blacks are 2x more likely to be serial killers!?!?!? Look up your stats….90% of serial killers have been are white. There has been one black serial killer.
No maybe you look up some stats…..
There has certainly been more than one Black serial killer:
Matthew Emanuel Macon (Murdered 5 White in Lansing)
Shelly Brooks (Murdered 7 prostitutes in Detroit Cass Corridor)
Jervon Miguel Coleman (Murdered three people.)
Brian Ranard Davis (6 women known murdered )
Paul Durousseau (Seven women)
Mark Goudeau “The Baseline Killer” (Eight women and a man in 2005-2006)
Coral Eugene Watts (11 women in Texas & 1 in Michigan)
Anthony McKnight (Five girls and young women)
Derrick Todd Lee (8 Women)
Charles Lendelle Carter (4 known murders; admits to ‘hunting’ Atlantans for 15 years)
The Zebra Killings
Chester Turner (L.A.s most prolific killer 12 women killed.)
Lorenzo J. Gilyard (Kansas City, MO.—13 victims)
Eugene Victor Britt (Gary, IN.–3 known murder/rapes.)
Ray Joseph Dandridge and his uncle, Ricky Gevon Gray (Richmond, VA.–Murdered 7 people in 7 days)
Henry Louis Wallace (Raped and strangled 5 women to death.)
Craig Price (Brutally murdered 3 women)
Harrison Graham (Brutally Murdered 3 women)
John Allen Muhammad & Lee Boyd Malvo (Sniped 11 people from a car in DC, 9 died.)
George Russell (3 women, WA state)
Timothy W. Spencer (5 killed, Arlington, VA and Richmond, VA)
Elton M. Jackson (12 gay men killed, Norfolk, VA area)
Carlton Gary (3 killed in Columbus, GA)
Mohammed Adam Omar (16 women, Yemen. Omar is Sudanese.)
Kendall Francois (8 women, Poughkeepsie, NY and surrounding areas.)
Terry A. Blair (8 women, Kansas City area)
Wayne Williams (33 many of them children!, Atlanta, GA)
Vaughn Greenwood (11 killed in LA)
Andre Crawford (10 killed in Chicago – southside)
Calvin Jackson (9 killed possibly more in NY)
Gregory Klepper (killed 8, Chicago – southside)
Alton Coleman (Killed 8 in the Midwest)
Harrison Graham (killed 7+ in N. Philadelphia)
Cleophus Prince (6 killed in, San Diego
Robert Rozier (7 killed in, Miami)
Maurice Byrd (killed 20 + in St. Louis)
Maury Travis (17 and rising, St. Louis and possibly also Atlanta)
Hulon Mitchell, a.k.a. Yahweh Ben Yahweh (killed 20+ in Florida)
Lorenzo Fayne (killed 5 children in East St. Louis, IL)
Charles Jackson (at least 4 women dead, maybe more)
Eddie Lee Mosley (killed 25 to 30 women, south Florida)
Henry Lee Jones (killed 4 in, south Florida; Bartlett, TN)
Richard “Babyface” Jameswhite (15 killed in, New York; Georgia.)
Donald E. Younge, Jr. (killed 4), East St. Louis, IL; Salt Lake City, UT.
Daniel O Jones (Killed four women while on parole for raping a high school teacher)
Michael Vernon (Bronx, NY. Killed at least seven people – )
Chester Dewayne Turner (12 women killed in, Los Angeles)
As for Rob’s assertion that as a percentage of their population there have been more black serial killers than white serial killers. I have read in several publications:
Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet, Oct. 31, 2002
Many a black comedian has perversely cracked that blacks may kill each other, but they don’t shoot-up, blow-up, or hack-up crowds of people. This bit of gallows humor always gets an uproarious laugh from black audiences.
For decades blacks took morbid pride and comfort in the notion that despite the long, tortured experience of slavery, segregation, racially motivated violence and poverty, mass killing supposedly was a white folks thing.
The assumption was that all serial killers were young, whacked out white males. It is easy to believe that. In the rash of Hollywood slasher, horror, and maniacal thrill kill films, serial killers are routinely depicted as deranged white males.
The obsessive media attention on serial killers such as Son of Sam, David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, and the Unabomber, also reinforce the notion that serial killers are loopy white males.
The horde of police, profiling experts, and psychologists that paraded endlessly across the TV screen during the serial sniper ordeal speculating about who the killer was and why he killed bought into this stereotype.
If, as it appears, John Allen Muhammad, cold-bloodedly gunned down a dozen persons, and terrorized the Washington D.C. area, they were all embarrassingly, and wildly wrong in their assumptions. And all the old profiles and theories about who mass killers are must be scrapped. But then again those profiles should be scrapped. Muhammad is not a total aberration.
Two studies on serial killers that specifically looked at the race of the killers found that blacks make up about 15 percent of America’s rogue’s gallery of mass murderers.
Their ghastly killings still strike fear, dread and disgust in the communities they pillaged. During the 1980s, Wayne Williams was convicted of multiple murders in Atlanta and authorities think he may have killed even more. Coral Watts claimed that he killed 13 women in several states.
In the early 1990s, Cleophus Prince Jr. stabbed six women in San Diego, and authorities in East St. Louis strongly suspect a black man is responsible for a string of still unsolved killings of prostitutes in the area.
The victims of black serial murderers almost always are other blacks, who most often live in the poorest inner city neighborhoods where the murder rates are far higher than in middle-class suburbs. Because black on black violence is so entrenched and pervasive, it is far too often considered routine, and police are often more lax in their attitudes toward the violence than if the victims were white.
This makes it much easier for black serial murders to go undetected for far longer times.
The implicit message is that black lives are expendable. This perceived devaluation of black lives through the horrid mix of racism, ignorance, and indifference has encouraged disrespect for the law and has forced many blacks to internalize anger and displace aggression onto other blacks.
And that’s important to understand, because those young blacks that commit random self-destructive acts, no matter how far beyond the pale of society’s accepted code of behavior, still are savvy enough to target victims who pose no real physical or personal threat to them. The serial sniper’s victims fit that profile. They were racially diverse, posed no danger to the sniper, and were apparently chosen at random.
In the immediate weeks before Muhammad’s alleged terror spree there are disturbing signs that more blacks driven by rage, bitterness, and frustration, are more willing than ever to wreak random and grotesque violence on themselves and others.
In September, a pack of young, one as young as 10 years old, and not so young black males, mauled a hapless man in Milwaukee. In June, another mob of young blacks grabbed national headlines when they stomped to death two men in Chicago. The mob’s victims in Milwaukee and Chicago were low-income, middle-aged men, or had alcohol and drug problems. They were easy pickings, just as the serial sniper’s victims were.
Though it’s not yet known exactly what drove Muhammad to his alleged killing binge, it is known that he was a man consumed by personal rage and frustration over failed marriages, tangled personal relationships, sour business dealings, and a rocky military career.
These personal demons, not terrorist ties of which authorities have yet to find evidence, may well have been enough to push him to commit his monstrous destructive acts.
But equally ominous, his killing rampage showed that it is a perilously short step from the random violence that claims innocent lives, causes monumental personal suffering, and paralyzes many poor, inner city black neighborhoods, to random violence that causes personal suffering, and paralyzes whole cities, even a nation.
That’s a terrible price to pay for ignoring walking time bombs such as Muhammad. And as we discovered with him, they can come in all colors.
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and columnist. Visit his news and opinion website. He is the author of The Crisis in Black and Black (Middle Passage Press).
Why do these White nationalists (overwhelmingly Nordicists) fear genetic destruction while no one else does? Because they think they are superior.
Why do the Nordicists alone of all of the White subgroups want to set up separate Nordic enclaves to keep the other White subgroups from breeding with them? Because they think they are the most superior Whites of them all, and they think all of the White groups are grotesquely inferior.
This is why only Whites are agitating for racial separatism (other than Jews). They are the only people on Earth who really believe deep down inside that they are scientifically, provably, better than anyone else, and at the same time, they are threatened with mass immigration into their lands, which threatens their genetic superiority, mostly through interbreeding.
And the Meds, Armenids, Arabs, Iranians and others are not agitating for separate homelands in the US. Why not? They don’t care if they breed in with other Whites. Why don’t they care? They don’t think they are superior to other Whites.
To WN’s, Whites breeding with any other race is destructive not due to genetic destruction (this is their big lie) but because said interbreeding will automatically mean Whites breeding in with inferior races, since all non-Whites are inferior.
To Nordicists, breeding in with any other White subrace is destructive not due to genetic destruction (this is their big lie) but because said White interbreeding will automatically mean Nordics breeding in with inferior White subgroups, since all other White subgroups are grotesquely inferior.
Nordicists are really the only significant sub-movement in US White nationalism. In the US, there really is not any mirror movement of say Meds, Slavs, Armenids, Iranids, Berberids, Arabids, Dinarics, Alpines or whatever. Why not? Those White people don’t think they are superior to other Whites and they pretty much could care less about White interbreeding. You only care about interbreeding if you think you’re superior.
And Nordicism is all about superiority. It’s not about celebration of their culture or any of that crap. They’re the only real White people, and all the rest are mongrels, part-muds, part-niggers, part-Asians, etc. Why are they the only real ones? Because only they are pure. The rest are somewhat contaminated, and hence partially degenerated and part-destroyed.
It’s amazing that it took me so damn long to figure that out.