Looks Is Everything For Women, Nothing For Men

In the comments section, Shawn says that what matters for young men is looks and for older men it’s increasingly money as they get older.

The problem is that looks alone is almost completely worthless for males of any age. Females of any age simply do not place any value whatsoever on looks absent other qualities.

I’ve known some young goodlooking guys (age 20-45) who were just about the best looking guys in the whole town. No woman would have anything to do with them, not even one, or not really. These guys went many years without even so much as a date. No sex at all, and very few if any dates.

I don’t think that looks alone matters one bit to females of any age.

Now, if you have other attributes, such as confidence, charm, etc. in addition to looks, you can do well. But looks alone doesn’t mean jack  shit to females of any age. I’m pretty sure of that.

Some of these guys had what this Feminist Critics column calls gender-nonconforming behaviors – they were overly agreeable, shy, introverted, unassertive, or sensitive. Any one of these behaviors, not to mention all of them, is pretty deadly in a male. Females simply will not tolerate it. If they do end up with females, the females typically are mean and cruel to them, bitch at them, and constantly complain that they are not masculine. It’s a lot of fucking Hell to go through just to get laid. I can’t blame some of them for just saying fuck it, I’m through with women.

Even worse are mental disorders. Mood disorders might be ok, especially manic-depression, as the manic phase is pretty masculine. I don’t see how depressive males of any age, looks or wealth status can get any woman on Earth. It’s beyond me. Depression is seen as utterly unmasculine, and females do not accept it in males at all.

Yet I suppose depressives do better than anxiety disorders. There’s almost nothing worse for a man than to have some sort of a nervous or anxiety condition. Anxiety is just not masculine, that’s all there is to it. Women are nervous. Guys aren’t. Nervous guys are just screwed. I don’t see how they can get laid at all by anyone, but some of them do. In general, guys with anxiety are seriously treated like shit by all of the women in their lives, and this will continue as long as the anxiety disorder is ongoing.

Small wonder that few men will admit to such things. Or that males treat depression and anxiety disorders with booze and drugs. It’s tragic that it’s more ok for a guy to be a heavy drinker than to be depressed.

Some of the guys I refer to above seemed to have some sort of anxiety disorders, some seemed depressed, and some just seemed like of spacey or out there. Quite a few were extremely intelligent. These guys had two things going for them. They were nearly the best looking guys in town, and they were also just about the smartest guys in town. As a previous post pointed out, brains is worthless to women. So the smartest and best looking guys in town were completely worthless to nearly the whole female population since they lacked certain other attributes.

Now compare that to men. Suppose we had some women, aged 20-45. And they were just about the hottest chicks in town. Could you imagine any possible world where all the guys would completely ignore or even disdain them and refuse to have anything to do with them? Are you kidding?

Suppose they were depressives, or nervous, or spacey? Guys think most women are depressives anyway, and the rest are sort of nervous. As far as spacy, that would probably make her even more popular. I’ve never heard of a guy refusing to date a totally hot babe because she’s sort of out there. That’s ridiculous!

There are certain paths out of these dilemmas, but I’m not sure how well they work. The commenter on Feminist Critics said that he changed his gender-nonconforming behaviors towards a more acceptable form of masculinity and soon he found women wanting to date him. That would be the way that I would suggest to go. Some guys just won’t have it in them.

Sexmaniacman, for all the 100-plus women and girls he’s slept with, has found that no matter how macho he acts, people still think he’s a fuckin fag or a wimp. He’s basically given up on the project as hopeless and instead works on inner masculinity. He’s not a queer, and he’s not a wimp at all. Wimps won’t fight back, and if you mess with Sexdude, he will slit your throat without batting an eye.

Inner masculinity is very important for a man, assuming you want it. Now a guy like Sexman, he’s pretty androgynous in a 1970’s glam rocker kind of way. He’ll still  be New York Dolls 1974 when he’s in his 80’s if he makes it that far. As he put it to me, he says the masculine part of him is like the toughest, hardest, baddest, most ultra machisimo guy that ever lived, but then, you know, he’s got this other side.

But he says he’s much happier since he has gotten into his inner masculinity. He’s still got that other side, but that just means that his Yin and Yang are in harmony, like they ought to be.

Thing is, a lot of straight guys are just not very masculine. That’s just the way they are, and most of them want to be this way. I leave them alone, because I don’t see anything wrong with it, and I figure other people are going to be pummeling them over this their whole lives anyway, so why add to it. A lot of guys are not into being masculine. It’s not part of their image. A lot of like admit to being wimps and say that they like it. But I don’t think it works.

I’d recommend getting rid of the sensitivity part. Emotions are useless in man, so who needs em?

If you’re depressed, ok, but don’t talk about it, and try to cover it up. Don’t admit it if asked. Do something else instead, like drink.

If you have anxiety stuff, try to get outside of it the best you can. A lot of people are hopeless, but at least you can try. There are also pharmaceutical drugs you can take.

If you’re introverted or shy, that’s a tough one. When you’re in a store, start talking to the person at the counter. Make casual conversation with the doctor, the receptionist, the repairman, the checker. If you’re overly agreeable, call people on their shit. Be prepared to lose friends and lovers when you do so.

Interesting Take on the Outrageous Supreme Court Decision

When these clowns Roberts and Alito came up for nomination for the Supreme Court under ultra-rightwing George Bush’s Administration, the few of us who are sane were saying all along that these guys were a nightmare in waiting. Almost none of my “liberal” friends believed me. After all, I’m Chicken Little. The Democratic Party completely caved in to the ultraright radicals that Bush nominated, saying in effect that they were just fine. Alito in particular was outrageous, lying for days on the stand.

Now we’ve come full circle and as usual, Chicken Little me was right and my liberal friends and the idiot Democratic Party were dead wrong. Perhaps you have heard of the Citizens United vs. FEC case (full court brief)that was decided on January 21, 2010. First of all, the case is the most egregious case of judicial activism. Based on in stare decesis, the Court is supposed to allow lower court rulings to stand, in this case an appellate court ruling. Further, the finding that the court ruled on was one that the plaintiffs had already agreed to drop in lower court.

In order to overrule the lower court, there must be a clear, present and immediate public need involved. What is the clear and present public need in overturning all of our campaign financing laws?

It’s much worse than that. We are now not allowed to put any limits whatsoever on campaign contributions by the corporations and the rich. Medical lobbies spent $1.5 million/day during the Heath Care Reform debate to kill progressive reform. There are now estimates that we could see lobbies spending up to 30-50 times as much as they are currently spending. That’s a tsunami of campaign cash.

Those of you who don’t live in the US don’t know what it’s like. Especially during election season, you are bombarded with an endless barrage of big-money and corporate commercials on the TV. Turn on the radio and it’s similar. Open your mailbox and and an avalanche of corporate brochures piles into your lap. Open a newspaper and there are huge big money and corporate full page ads all through our biggest papers.

Never mind that nearly all of the TV and radio stations, large newspapers and newsmagazines are already more or less exact mouthpieces of these same corporate and big money interests.

In every way that makes sense, America is now an oligarchy. Like similar oligarchical shitholes scattered all of over the ruined Third World, the class interests are foreordained. On my Maoist list, a Maoist recently said that it is the position of the moneyed classes everywhere on Earth to be ultraright.

This is their logical position. They can’t be blamed for it anymore than a shark can be blamed for attacking a swimmer. In the ruined Third World, the rich and the upper middle classes and sadly often the entire business class always lines up with the most ferociously reactionary wing of the oligarchy.

Tragically, much of the middle class often does the same. Recall that Marx said that the middle classes always ally themselves with the rich. In the US, typically once anyone gets any money at all, they usually move into this ultra-right position. This is particularly true if they make their fat cash working for a corporation.

So this is what we’ve become. A wealthy version of a Third World oligarchical ultra-right shithole. The stolen elections are already here. The oligarchs have a death grip on the media. Civil liberties are winding down. So what’s next?

In the event of any profound Left uprising, even unarmed such as Guatemala 1954, El Salvador 1980, Aristide in Haiti, Chavez in Venezuela, Allende in Chile, Morales in Bolivia, Correa in Ecuador, Dominican Republic 1965 or Brazil 1964, I would assume the US would quickly witness military coups, death squads and possibly even armed guerrillas on the Left as a response. If a Left regime came to power, we may well see armed contras, probably funded by the rich and the corporations.

The law shreds 100 years of laws by state and federal governments that attempted to limit campaign contributions. David Souter dourly noted this in his dissent.

The following is an interesting argument from a website I’m a member of suggesting that the decision was treason. Reason being that the court refused to say that foreigners could not also spend as much as they wanted to influence US issues and elections. This means that the only way to stop foreigners from flooding our political debates and campaigns with cash to buy their way to control over our nation is for the Congress to stop them by passing a law.

But such a law can never be passed because an openly treasonous party, the Republican Party, will never pass any law limiting foreigners right to spend whatever they can to influence our debates and elections. So we’re screwed.

Many are suggesting an Amendment of the Constitution. This will not work. We need 67 votes in the Senate, and we don’t have them. Then we need 75% of the states to pass and it ain’t happening. Even the reasonable Equal Rights Amendment has never been able to get through due to idiot rightwing opposition in the states.

By any fair legal definition, the decision yesterday by The Supreme Court 5 constitutes nothing less than an act of treason against the people of the United States. Having read and analyzed the entire 183 page decision and all of its concurring and dissenting opinions ourselves, we are fully prepared to support this accusatory conclusion.

Having so grossly abused its jurisdiction by presuming to decide a question expressly waived by the petitioner in the Court below (p 12), this rogue Supreme Court ruled for the first time that no corporation can be constrained from unlimited influence over our elections.

And even assuming that the Court intended the decision to only apply to American corporations, the Court expressly declined (pp 46-47) to reach the question of whether foreign ownership stakes in American corporations should likewise be given carte blanche to put their thumbs on the scales of our democracy.

Thus, until Congress further acts (and it must, though it could not have escaped the attention of The Supreme Court 5 that the current Republican minority has vowed to obstruct anything of consequence that Congress might try to pass), there is now nothing to constrain foreign nationals, even our most sworn enemies, from usurping what even the most die hard Tea Bagger takes as an article of faith, that the rights of citizenship of this country are only for Americans.

This must be construed, within the four corners of our Constitution, as deliberately and knowingly exposing the United States of America to harm in the interim, by giving “aid and comfort” to our enemies (Constitution Article 3, section 3), should our enemies now wish to take advantage of this unprecedented and rash decision. In simple constitutional terms . . . treason!!

The fact is that we now live in a world of giant transnational
corporations, with allegiance to no sovereign government, let alone our own, sworn only to exploit the most vulnerable and desperate workers they can find in any country of the world. How does The Supreme Court 5 propose parsing which of these extra-national legal artificialities should be allowed to corrupt our democratic election process? Apparently in their minds, all of them.

So what is it that we can and must do? The first and most prominent proposal we heard yesterday, and which we of course support, was to amend the Constitution to clarify that corporations have no such rights as people (which is to say U.S. citizens).

While this certainly could not hurt, and would obviously help (assuming such an proposed amendment could garner 67 votes in a Senate already stalemated by obstructionism, let alone be ratified by 3/4 of the states, including many “red” ones), what we must first assert is that there is nothing wrong with our Constitution, and demand that Congress do whatever it can to protect it.

Because just as importantly, we are on ominous and clear notice that there is no further outrage these 5 gangsters in black robes are not gleefully and arrogantly capable of. Indeed, in his dissenting opinion (that the majority did not go far enough), Clarence Thomas characterized the decision as only a “first step” (Thomas opinion p. 1).

It is worth nothing that the authorship of the majority opinion is claimed by Anthony M. Kennedy, heretofore generally considered the least wing nutty of the 5. Therefore, the immediate and unavoidably
necessary recourse must be impeachment for all five, treason already being a high crime, otherwise the horrors yet to issue from their treacherous minds is too terrible to contemplate.

Tom Leykis

Continuing on with our Game/PUA theme these days (LOL, is this turning into a Game/PUA blog?) check out these three videos by Tom Leykis. He’s a radio shock jock here in the US with an explicitly pro-male POV.

This first video is somewhat disturbing. It’s called Tom Leykis Talks About Women Over the Hill. In it, he says some smart things, but also some disturbing things. Like a lot of these Game/PUA guys, Leykis promotes Asshole Game and comes off rather misogynistic.

I don’t see the point. The whole male critique of feminism is that these bitches hate us, they hate us guys. We are understandably upset about that. So our response is, what? To be misogynists and hate all women? Forget it. If hating us men is wrong (and we say it is) then hating all women is wrong too.

The truth is that the best of us really love women, or we should anyway. That’s where I’m coming from. Sure women are sort of nuts, but I love em anyway. They’re lovable nuts, well, most of the time anyway. Anyway, who says guys are better. We guys are psycho and dangerous. That’s better than being nutty? Why? At least a wacky woman won’t try to kill me.

And what kind of woman do we like? The feminists who hate us? No. Or the women like Alpha Unit who unabashedly states, “I love men!” Sure, she slams us in some of her pieces. She makes it clear that we are congenitally dangerous and as a class, have rape tendencies. So we’re brutes. But we’re lovable brutes, AU would say.

So AU and I are coming from the same place. I love women, and she loves men. We both tell it like it is about the opposite sex and have no illusions about the other, but we love em anyway.

Leykis is Greek, and may be coming from a Greek POV. A commenter notes that his Greek parents ordered him never to go down on a woman. “Don’t you ever get on your knees and do that for any woman!” “No vasectomy…Make her get surgery!” His aunts were emphatic that all women were skanks and trash and never stopped warning him about women. An interesting culture. The misogyny has been accepted as fact by both sexes!

Leykis gives some disturbing advice.

Don’t ever compliment her, not on her looks, not on her intelligence, not on anything. Wow…Don’t ever sleep over at her place. Pretty soon she’ll start asking you to move in. Get off the phone! Quit calling her all the time, quit texting her all the time.

This is more or less Asshole Game. It’s depressing that this crap works at all with women. You mean the less I call her and the less I text her, the more she likes me? How depressing. My opinion of women just fell another 99%. I’m not so sure it’s even true. So if I feel like calling this woman I’m involved with, I should hold off because she’s so nuts, she’ll disrespect me for falling all over her.

The real womanizers I’ve known did not ignore women. They chased women fulltime. It was almost a fulltime job for them. They didn’t get success with women by ignoring them. Sexmaniacman told me that he used to call women all the time, and it never bothered them. But mostly for dates, not just to talk. And here we may have the crux. Women despise weakness. The player is goal-oriented. He’s calling her all the time with a goal in mind. A guy who calls her all the time just to talk about nothing seems sort of, well, wimpy?

AU says that women don’t mind guys who fall all over themselves for women, complimenting them, praising them, calling them, giving them gifts. Just not at the start of the relationship. Deep into the relationship, it feels great. But at the start, it seems like the guy is trying too hard or being self-abasing.

He also says to stop taking women’s calls. I don’t agree with that at all, but hey, maybe I’m wrong? Sexmaniacman regularly answers the phone for women, and he’s done all right.

He is right in a way that women like a guy who seems to be wanted by other women. If no women want the guy, he’s a loser and no women want him. Once you get a woman, now all the others want to take her away from you. Even a steady girlfriend often wants to feel like you are desired by other women, but you are not going for them out of duty to her. Basically, everyone loves a winner. This stuff applies more to younger women and not to older women. For us older folks, it’s not uncommon at all that we have nothing going on Friday night.

Not complimenting the woman is Asshole Game. They’re against it because it builds up her self-esteem. The Asshole Gamers want a woman with low self-esteem.

I don’t know, man. I’m going to disagree. Sexmaniacman usually tries to build up women’s self-esteem. That’s what they use him for, and that’s what they love him for. Women often lack self-esteem, but they like a strong man to encourage them and give them the self-esteem that they lack, to build them up. That’s what makes her secure and less nutty. A secure woman is a mellow woman, as AU says.

Anyway, Sexmaniacman has had great results complimenting women. It works great! It fact, it makes them melt in your hand, and maybe even in your mouth. You just have to say it right. The reason showering her with compliments often doesn’t work is that too many guys are too liberal with the compliments, so a lot of females just think it’s stupid or a line.

Thing is, be honest. If she doesn’t look that great, Sexdude would not say much. But if she’s hot or even beautiful, he would say so. But he would say so clearly, honestly and shamelessly, with no hint of dishonesty or charlatanism. Say it like you mean it, and do mean it. Then it works. Women love compliments properly done, and compliments have led Sexman to lots of sexual situations, including with some really beautiful women.

Another issue is more humanistic. If I have high self-esteem, don’t I want to be with a woman who has high self-esteem too? Why not? Self-esteem feels good, in men and in those who associate with me.

He also says not to have women over at your place, because then you can’t get rid of them. That’s not necessarily so. Women are independent actors these days, and Sexmaniacman said it was pretty common for them to take off in the morning, often a little ashamed at what they had done. Some took off in the afternoon. What’s wrong with sleeping with a woman anyway? Is it really so bad?

He also says not to sleep with a woman at her place either. Well, it can be a bit difficult sometimes in a new bed or place that you’re not used to, but it’s not so bad.

Leykis also says not to cuddle or spoon with women. Come on! That’s what they love more than anything; some say they like it more than sex. Sexmaniacman has been cuddling with women his whole life and they love it.

The next videos are downright disturbing. Leykis notes that he went to some seminar with pro NBA players where they revealed that women were taking the sperm out of condoms after the NBA guys had sex with them and then using it to impregnate themselves. Some guys were being hit with paternity suits afterward. This seems to hard to believe, but I guess it’s true. I always thought it was an urban legend.

So Leykis gave advice to his listeners to put Tabasco sauce in the condom after they threw it in the trash in the bathroom afterwards. Sure enough, the bitch took the sperm out of the condom and put it up her and got burned in her pussy. Then she sued the guy for damage to her pussy! I don’t think Tabasco sauce would actually injure a vagina though. Anyway, the judge apparently laughed it out of court.

The next one is similar. Another guy listening to the show did the same thing, but this time he put horseysauce from some restaurant in the condom. Same thing, bitch went in the bathroom afterwards, used to turkey baster thing to shoot it up her, and started screaming like a banshee. Same thing again, the crazy bitch sued the guy for damage to her vagina (GMAB! There’s not going to be any permanent injury down there.) The case is slated to go to trial soon, but it will probably be thrown out soon.

Is this a new thing, females tricking guys into getting them pregnant? Or has it always been going on? Good Lord. It’s really appalling. Makes you almost want to swear off sex. I think we need to change the laws to where this is fraud and at the least, the guy’s not responsible for the ensuing kid.

“What Is It With Feminists and Rape?” by Alpha Unit

New Alpha Unit. I’m the one who put the question to AU, “What is it with feminists and rape anyway? It’s all they ever talk about. They’re like a skipping record.” This is her response, and I think she’s onto something. When will men quit raping women in the US? Never. When will women be able to walk around anywhere in the US without fear of being raped? Never. That’s the reality, and all the feminist screeching is never going to change a thing.

First of all, I have to admit something.

I have never been raped. As I’ve stated earlier, I’ve put myself in harm’s way, particularly as a very young woman. But I’ve never been raped. So I don’t know what it’s like to be forced into sex. I don’t know what goes through a person’s mind when this is happening, and I don’t know what that person goes through afterward.

But the question has been put to me: Why do some feminists focus so much on rape? Is being raped any worse than some of the stuff men go through?

Clearly there are worse things in life than rape. Murder, for instance. Is there anyone who would say, “I’d rather be murdered than raped”? But rape continues to be of pressing concern in the “war” between men and women. Behind all the sound and fury concerning rape is something a lot of women simply find hard to acknowledge. It is fear. Women fear men. They don’t like knowing this, and they won’t admit it, some of them. But fear of men is what drives all this angst over rape. Isn’t this apparent?

Feminism has done a lot to change the thinking of women. But to the dismay of many of them, it hasn’t done much to change men. And this is problematic. This whole issue of rape is what makes it clear that on the most fundamental levels, nothing has changed. Women still have to be on guard with men they don’t know. They still can’t walk around at night all alone. They still have to actually look out for their safety, because that nice guy who seems so harmless right now could be up to no good.

He might slip something into your drink. He might use “game” on you to get you to do what he wants. He might get into your house on some pretext and then, once inside, rape you.

When are women going to be able to feel at ease? To walk around freely without fear of being attacked?

When will a woman be able to go to the hotel room of a man she doesn’t know and be assured that nothing bad will happen? Or get wasted at a party and be assured that she will be left in peace?

Not any time soon, it seems. It seems there is still reason to be afraid.

And who wants to be afraid all the time? It’s humiliating to realize that you are afraid of someone. Or afraid of a certain group of people. Having to pretend you are unafraid isn’t much better. Demanding that those people stop scaring you is worse.

What’s even crazier is insisting that you have some kind of right to go through life unafraid or unmolested. You can believe you have such a right; in fact, you can insist on it. But other people are not necessarily going to comply with your wishes. In some places you can expect people to agree with you. But in other places people won’t agree with you at all.

Most people in this world don’t know you. Most don’t care about you. It is foolish to assume that strangers will uphold your own notions of reality.

Women are always going to have to be careful, or even defensive, in their dealings with men they don’t know. This is just a fact. Do some of these angry, rape-obsessed women actually believe a day will come when people have no reason to fear other people?

These women aren’t really crazy. They’ve already decided on a “solution” to this problem. Yes, they berate men for their brutishness. But look behind the outcry and what you’ll see is a demand that men protect women.

Yes, protect us! In any sexually charged encounter with a woman, it doesn’t matter what the woman is saying; she may not realize what she’s saying, or she may say something she really doesn’t want to say. And it doesn’t matter what she does before, during, or after the encounter; she may not really mean what she’s doing. It’s up to you, the man, to look out for her interests, protect her, and make sure she’s safe. And happy with the outcome.

Because men have a duty not to harm women and to keep them safe!

We’ve come full circle.

Feminazi Rape Laws Gone Berserk

Here. From 2008.

Two boys, 15 and 16 years old, were with an 18 year old woman and another young woman. The second woman sees the bad vibes surrounding the situation and gets the Hell out of there fast. The 18 year old sticks around, but things get ugly.

First boy apparently date-rapes the girl. Second boy asks, “Me next?” Woman says fine, but you need to stop when I tell you. As soon as he’s in, she says, “Stop!” Guy pounds a few more pile-drivers for five more seconds, then pulls out.

Later the ditzy broad goes out to MacDonald’s with the two guys. She makes out in the restaurant with the first “rapist” and gives the second “rapist” her phone number. Later she files rape charges against both boys.

*The facts around this case are quite a bit murkier than the site I linked to made out. Please see the comments for details. However, the fact remains that under the Female Rule that the feminist crazies want, men will go down on rape for continuing with initially consensual sex for five seconds after she tells you to stop. That’s the take home point here.

The Latest Salvo From the Feminist Enemy

I don’t know what it is with radical feminists. They just seem to get nuttier and nuttier.

Denise Romano, M.A., Applied Lunacy, M.A. Advanced Feminist Batshittery, is out of control. Not satisfied trying to redefine seduction as rape, she is now apparently trying to have Roissy in DC arrested! For what, pray tell? For inciting physical and sexual assaults against women, which, according to Denise, is illegal. I doubt if it is. You can incite just about anything in the US from a blog or wherever. A few like Tom Metzger have gone down civilly, but no one ever goes down criminally. It’s not possible. Only in Feminazi Fantasy Land.

This points up another disturbing point about Female Rule which I touched on earlier. Females have always been censors. Males tend to be civil libertarians. A society based on Female Rule will not be a civil libertarian one, because at their core, most females simply do not believe in basic civil liberties.

They love to censor and ban speech, especially hate speech (whatever that is), pornography and God knows what else. Females are just natural born censors; that’s all there is to it. Which is one more reason that Female Rule must be opposed with all of our might.

Crazy feminazis like Denise Romano and Lady Raine claim that any sex with a “drugged or drunk” female is rape. Well, maybe so, but maybe one guy in 500 billion cases goes down on this charge, if that. In general, all of these charges are laughed out of court, when they are even filed. Women “raped” in this way never even bother to file.

Truth is, lots of women like to drink. Plenty of women are heavy drinkers, and many of those are alcoholics. It’s reasonable to assume that many bar-hopping, heavy drinking and alcoholic women can never consent to sex, since they are probably loaded most of the time they are in bed.

Many females nowadays like to take drugs, especially cannabis, cocaine and methamphetamine. Ecstacy, LSD and other hallucinogens are very popular. Quite a few women use heroin. Female users of all of these drugs very commonly have sex when they are flying on this or that illicit substance. Many find this drugged sex experience quite rewarding. I’ve never in my life heard of a guy going down on rape for having sex with a stoned female.

Recently, the UK, which has recently started to come under some serious Female Rule, has decided that any sex with any “drunk” female is rape. There have been a few charges here and there, but most have been laughed out of court, as should be the case. In one recent case, a judge said that just because a woman was drunk, it doesn’t mean she was raped. Well, of course.

Now it’s another thing to see some chick who is falling down drunk at a bar or a party and hone in on her and take advantage of her just because she is wasted. That’s a dishonorable thing to do for any man.

If she’s so wasted she is on the verge of passing out, why are you targeting her? To get laid? Sleazy.

I must say, I’ve never been seduced in my life. I’ve been drunk off my ass more times than I can count, and I’ve been blasted out of my skull on just about every drug known to mankind more times than I can count.

Plenty of women have made plays for me when I was totalled, and a lot of the time I said no. Sometimes I agreed, but it was something I wanted to do at the time. I had buyer’s remorse in the morning, but that’s not a crime on her part. Gay men have made plays for me many times too, often when I was pretty wasted. Of course I never let them seduce me. Why are women so stupid that they allow themselves, like children, to be seduced?

Denise and Raine complain that PUA is teaching men how to hypnotize and brainwash women into sleeping with guys. They say this is rape. No it isn’t. It’s seduction. I’ve been trying to brainwash and hypnotize women and girls my whole life into getting sexual with me, although I never thought of it that way before. “Hypnotism” and “brainwashing” is just Seduction 101, always has been. What of it?

I’ll make you an offer. Any woman I find unattractive or even any man can try to brainwash me or hypnotize me all they want to to try to get me into bed. It’s not going to work, especially for the guys. No guy can use mentalism to get me into bed, and if I don’t like the woman, it’s going to be hard for her too.

I’m having a hard time understanding the feminist hysteria about rape.

I’ve been beaten over the head with a baseball bat so bad I had to go to the neurology ward.

I got my lights punched out repeatedly.

I got jumped and pummeled by five guys in a nightclub.

I got assaulted at a party, fought back, picked the guy up and threw him onto a table, smashing the table to bits.

After a party, another vehicle accused me of cutting them off. They chased us in their car, drunk, throwing loaded cans of beer at us. Somehow they cornered us on a street and I was lugging the gears. They were out of their car and attacking us on foot, kicking the car, beating it with their fists, trying to pull the doors open. If they would have gotten the doors open, we would have been seriously beaten or maybe even killed.

I finally put the car in first gear and floored it. A maniac was running headlong at my car from the side. “Watch out!” my friend yelled. I didn’t care. I floored it. The car hit the guy and he went flying like in the movies, maybe 5-10 feet. I hit him with my car. On purpose. I don’t know if I killed him, but I hope I did.

This is normal Growing Up 101 for guys. How many guys have been pummeled, robbed, mugged, assaulted, etc in their lifetimes? Most of us. Is rape really worse than this? Why? Prove that it’s worse than the typical life-threatening or life-terrorizing beatings, attacks and tortures many or most of us males experienced when we were young men.

Even more, I’ve been raped (or sexually assaulted), by feminist definitions. I picked up a sociopathic hitchhiker, he commandeered my vehicle, tried to destroy the engine, sexually fondled me, pummeled me and poured beer over me, all while I was driving on a freeway. I was a psychological wreck for 3 1/2 weeks, then I said, “Screw it, I’m moving on.” Isn’t that as bad as what a lot of female rape victims experienced? Was what they experienced worse? Why? Prove it.

Hey, come on. Life’s tough for everyone. Women get raped. So do some guys. And lots of guys get kidnapped, pummeled, gang-beaten, beaten with objects, often over the head, robbed, mugged, threatened with death and, by the cops, arrested, brutalized, beaten, threatened with death and imprisoned in the Hell of incarceration, on and on. Who says females have a Pain Monopoly anyway?

No one gets out of this shit called life unscathed. No one. Females have not patented Victim Status.

“Are All Men Rapists?” by Alpha Unit

New Alpha Unit. Good stuff. I agree with her though, we men are basically dogs, it’s true. But that’s the way we are supposed to be. It’s natural, normal.

By my own reasonable definition of the word, I’ve never raped a woman. Yet I’ve been accused of rape by a woman, actually a girl, Hell, a 14 year old girl at that! It didn’t happen. I had sex with her all right, but I sure didn’t rape her. She was drunk, but so was I. So what?

By the daffynitions of Lady Raine and Denise Romano, I’ve been raping women all my life. I don’t agree with that daffynition, but hey, if that’s the newfangled Feminazi daffynition of rape, so be it. In that case, I’m a rapist. And much worse than that. As far as their redaffyning seduction as rape goes, in that case, speaking of seduction-rape only, I also say that rape is fun! Put that in your pipe and smoke it, feminists.

I’ll have more to say about this in a bit.

Clint Eastwood, whose name I brought up the other day in one of the comments threads, has always been one of my favorite actors – at least in his Westerns. He played a number of roles in which he is this stranger who rides into town and sets things straight. He’s tall, lean, rugged, laconic – his entire demeanor says, “I don’t know you. And I don’t need to know you.”

His name? What do you care?

In 1973 he appeared in a film called High Plains Drifter. Critics praised it; audiences enjoy it to this day. But as you might expect, some people have a problem with a particular scene that occurs at the beginning of the movie. The Stranger drags a woman into the stables and rapes her.

What’s even more appalling is that after a while, she seems to enjoy it.

What?

What is this scene doing in this film? Were the writers misogynists? Was Clint Eastwood a misogynist?

Some people who comment on this scene call it “disturbing.” I think people find it disturbing not because of what it suggests about men but what it suggests about women.

In another scene, he grabs the hotelkeeper’s wife to force her into bed with him – in the presence of the hotelkeeper! She fights and resists and calls out to her husband to stop what’s happening. But later she is seen lazing about in the bed in which she has been raped, quite contented.

There is no doubt about it. The Stranger is a rapist.

The first woman he raped is the stereotypical Bad Woman – the town tramp. In fact, it’s clear from the beginning of the scene that she sets her sights on The Stranger and deliberately makes a play for his attention. She runs into him on purpose and proceeds to insult him. He tries, in fact, to walk away from her, more than once. But she won’t let him.

The second woman is the Good Woman. The only person who tried to intervene in a lynching – a pivotal incident that is shown in flashbacks.

Both women get raped. Both apparently derive enjoyment from it. And the rapist is presented as The Good Guy.

Do good guys rape women? Or is that something only done by bad guys?

This is a difficult question, only because there are men out there who consider themselves good guys, in spite of the fact that they have raped. There are ostensibly good guys out there who feel that it’s okay to rape under certain circumstances. Some male college students who have been surveyed in the United States and elsewhere report not only that in some situations a woman is “asking for it,” but if there were no chance of getting caught, they would definitely rape!

Many of these young men are “good” guys. With good upbringings in good homes. But if they could get away with rape, they’d go for it. Are we to believe that there’s something abnormal about them?

As I’ve mentioned previously, armies throughout history have engaged in the systematic rape of female civilians during war. Military commanders have at times encouraged it. Aren’t some of the soldiers who succumb to this pressure “good” guys?

There are many men who report that under no circumstances is it okay to rape. If some wholesome-looking young man were to say to me, “I’d never do something like that,” I’d admire his sincerity. But I’d probably be thinking to myself, “Never say never.”

Statement on Game/PUA Community

The “Game” and PUA (Pickup Artist Community) guys is a movement of guys who are trying to teach other guys how to get women. More crudely, you can say they are teaching them how to get laid. However, some married men with no interest in cheating are just using game to try to control their out of control wives, or as one man put it, “to deal with the insanity of the typical American wife.”

Game teaches you how to manipulate and control women in order to get them to do what you want them to do. Women use Game on us all the time. They constantly try to manipulate and control us to try to get us to do what they want us to do. Each sex is entitled to use Game or any other legal techniques to try to get their partners and love interests to do what they want them to do, assuming everything is legal.

There are no moral issues here, because all’s fair in love and war. Tell you what, women? You first. You stop fighting dirty first (Women are the ultimate champions at fighting dirty; men are just cheap penny pikers), then we’ll follow suit.

What the PUA community does and the techniques it uses go for beyond the scope of this post.

Some of their techniques involve phrases like ASD, LMR and bitch shield. When a woman is not giving you sex or physical affection, she is said to have her bitch shield up. Ok, that’s kind of funny. Me? I just might not call her back unless I have a chance soon. I go to work real soon, and I am manhandling and getting physical by the first date. I get slapped down a lot, and it doesn’t always get me into bed, but in general, it works great. You have to get physical with these women!

ASD and LMR stand for anti-slut defense and last-minute resistance. This is when the woman is holding out on you. Ok, that’s kind of funny too. Usually in my case she has already gotten really physical with me but is now holding out on the best part of the game. Of course I have utilized all sorts of psychological techniques to wear down these common defenses. I recommend other guys do too.

These PUA guys also do stuff called “negs,” and “refusing to validate.” I don’t see the point. Negs is where you insult her, often openly and in front of others. It’s testament to the extremely low moral quality of the female in general that this disgusting technique makes them want to mate with us.

“Refusing to validate” is similar. To some extent, this makes sense, but I’m not going to do it in that callous PUA way. Problem is that most guys fall all over themselves like puppy dogs or babies when they are with women, kissing women’s feet, showering them with stupid lines, gifts, compliments and adoring, puppy-like affection. Reasonably enough, many women find such self-abasing behavior disgusting.

My technique is to act like, “Hey look, I’m too busy to chase women! What the Hell do you want anyway?”

Another one is to act like you have women after you all the time.

“Oh boy, here’s one more, just what I need? So impress me babe. Realize you’re competing with hundreds of other females for my overwhelmingly desired attention? How are you going to show me you’re better than the rest? How are you going to beat all these other women.”

Another thing is to never let a woman know you’re not dating anyone. Traditional women don’t mind hearing it, but American women are psycho. He not dating anyone means, “He’s a loser.” Women only want what others want or better yet have. Never let them know at the beginning that they are the only one. Never let them know that you aren’t getting any. Always give them the impression that you have an easy return no questions asked policy and she can be replaced with a better model anytime.

Never let a woman know you’re lacking in sexual experience. Never let a woman know you’ve been celibate for any length of time at the present. A history of many women works better than a history of few to none. Women say they hate studs, but they can’t stop sleeping with them.

As soon as women figure out you haven’t been getting any, or you lack sexual experience, or haven’t had many women in your life, they will start running their own Game on you, and boy! You think the PUA guys’ Game is evil! Wait til you see this Game she’s about to run on you! The only way to deal with women is from a position of strength. Women see weakness, grab the ball and make a 90-yard dash to make a touchdown in your territory, then throw the ball to the ground and dance a little jig right on your balls.

It’s sad that we have to act this way, but really, these somewhat shitty techniques work great.

Anyway, that’s my version of Game. It’s worked quite well for me in life.

I don’t like the PUA or game community all that much. They say to get women you need to act like an asshole and treat women like shit to some extent. They’ve tested these theories as scientifically as you can, and they’ve proven that they’ve worked. They throw out theory that doesn’t work and try new things all time. It’s a very science-based approach.

This just reaffirms my increasingly low opinion of women. I see. So…the way for me to get women is to be mean to them, do “negs” on them, treat them like shit, “refuse to validate them,” on and on.

Well, nothing new here. I’ve noticed for 35 years that the assholes get most of the women, and the rest of the guys don’t get crap, or get evil carping bitches. Worse, the women are nice to the assholes, and seem to enjoy being treated like shit by a bunch of near sociopaths.

Well, that’s just wonderful, isn’t it? Want to be successful with women? Just act like a quasi-psychopath, treat ‘em like crap, insult them, cheat on them, psychologically abuse them, because the damned bitches are masochistic freaks and get off on being treated like shit by a modern day Caveman with a club. And the nice guys get kicked in the balls and then kicked to the curb.

Wonderful, just wonderful. Game isn’t telling me anything new. If mentally ill masochistic females reward the most callous, cruel and sociopathic males with the most love, sex and obedient behavior, while the nice guys always lose, who can blame guys for giving some of these crazy biatches what they want? I won’t.

But it’s not for me. If I have to “invalidate,” “neg,” treat like shit, insult and abuse women in order to get laid, Hell, I’ll just stay home. I have a hard drive full of porn, and that’s all I need, but at least my conscience will be clear.

Lunatic, Psycho Feminists Say Seduction is Rape

And of course, demand prison time and civil liability for men who succeed in talking silly or drunk women into bed. I don’t have time to go into it in depth here, feel free to read on at the site, although it’s very long.

Denise Romano is some kind of academic, and a therapist to boot.

Therapists area always trying to get us to act too nice to succeed in American society. I’ve had quite a few therapists openly call me a scumbag. I usually assume that means they are just calling me a man, so it’s a compliment. I openly refuse any and all female therapists anymore and am regularly raked over the coals in their “community” for being sane in this regard.

Therapy is a kick, and it’s really helpful, even for quite sane people. If you can get it for free, go for it, assuming you have problems in living, which all humans do. I’ve had years of it, and I’m about through. I learned all about myself (Cool!) and all about most everyone in my past, especially the assholes (Mega-cool!) and now there’s not a whole lot left to learn. But it was a very neat experience, and I’m much healthier and happier as a result.

No man should ever do therapy with any female therapist. Your therapy probably involves sex, and all female therapists are insane about sex, since they are females, and come from the Female Paradigm.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with radical feminism. It’s the enemy of all men, but so are women in a way, so that’s right in tune with the circle of life.

Radical feminism is simply the logical anarchy and madness that occurs when males of any society lose control of their women. The women go insane and try to institute Female Rule. Radical feminism is what happens when you give women the power to institute Female Rule over society. It sucks for men, and really for most women too, but it’s what most women want deep down inside. Which is why we need to control these biatches!

I repeat that neither Male Rule or Female Rule should be legally coded. The state is a neutral party in the War Between Men and Women. The War is natural and normal; it is remarked upon in all ethnographies of all primitive societies. It exists because males and females want different things in many respects. Each gender has a right to pursue their own interests to the detriment of the other within the framework of law and society.

The state needs to stay out of this mudfest and be as neutral as possible. Like at a party, where the strong guys hold everyone back and say, “Let em fight it out!” hoping the cool guy kicks the despised idiot’s ass.

In a previous post, I remarked that Male Rule at least functions, though it sucks for women. This is because it is concordant with Natural Law. Female Rule doesn’t even work at all. It causes anarchy and confusion, because it violates Nature.

Anyway, this is the natural result of Female Rule. Everywhere on Earth it’s been tried, the same chaos and idiocy resulted. What was the first thing they did when we granted these silly dames suffrage? They banned booze! Probably one of the stupidest things thing country’s ever done, except invading Iraq. Mega-stupid X10.

But everyone on Earth Female Rule is instituted, this is what they do. In Maoist ruled-India, the fool Maoists put women in charge. What happened? Guess. They banned booze, prostitution, gambling and porn. The four things that keep most guys halfway sane and prevent them from shooting up the fuckin post office. Way to go, chicks!

Everywhere you allow Female Rule, this is what they do: ban booze or dope, prostitution, porn and gambling. Females are a bunch of party-poopers, and they need to be kept in line and not allowed too much power or we’re all living grey Puritan lives.

Even worse, they may even ban adultery.

The Shining Path instituted Female Rule in areas of Peru, and in addition to the death penalty for whiffing coke (Please!) they instituted corporal punishment, up to public execution, for men who sampled the greener grass of their female neighbors. This is what these bitches will do if we let them rule us: they’ll execute you for cheating on your wife.

There are also references in the link to some crazy attention whore named Lady Raine. Whatever she is, she represents how far our Western White women have gotten out of line since we let them off the leash. She’s a former stripper who lectures men about morality. As if this whore has a leg to stand on. She’s furious at men, and she’s raising a son all alone, because she prefers it that way.

Anyway, the less said about Lady Cumstain the better, and if she comes here, I will probably have to ban her.

Guys! This is what happens if you let women rule you! The crazy bitches will make seduction illegal! Damn!

Women must be controlled!

Guys: Will Your High IQ Get You Women?

Please…you’ve got to be kidding me.

tulio writes in the comments section:

Some women do appreciate high intelligence. That’s why my favorite type of woman is the “sexy professor” type. Brains + beauty.

I learned long ago that this is one of the lies of females, or rather, their self-deceptions. Women often say, “I love a smart guy!”

Bullshit! No they don’t.

As someone with a high IQ, I can vouch for this. My high IQ never once got me laid. I don’t think it ever even got me a Goddamned date. What good is it? I don’t know. I like it, but it sure never got me any chicks. Back in the days when I did great with women, my one secret was hiding my brains. I on purposely acted like a dumb surfer-stoner idiot. My brothers used to take me to task on that. “You’re acting stupid on purpose! And you’re not! You’re smart! It’s fake! Quit acting stupid.” Oh for Chrissake, man. I was only trying to get some chicks. The dumber I acted, the more chicks I got. Real simple equation.

Young women will openly admit that they want a hulking caveman with a club, a rough and stupid type. It’s sexy. That’s what turns them on. Even high-IQ young women are like this. They often marry big dumb macho guys, and spend years of unhappiness. Finally when they are 40 and their sex drive goes down or their they gain some sense, they marry some brainy nerd for his money. And they are a lot happier.

Once they start getting a bit older, women start saying that smart guys are a turn-on. Yet another female self-deception. It’s a lie. I don’t believe it!

I had one girlfriend who claimed to like my brains, but it was obvious that it didn’t turn her on. She acted like my brains were some weird mystical object in a museum that you can’t understand. Is it weird? Yeah. Is it cool? Sort of, except you can’t understand it. Does it make you horny? Yeah right.

We had an open relationship (my specialty) so there was no such thing as cheating, but she loved to do it anyway, and rub it in my face at that. Being a decadent postmodern degenerate, I really didn’t care. She’d tell me I had go home. She was off for the weekend. Ok, no problem babe.

“I have a date!” she’d scream.

“Good for you,” I was stoned and didn’t care anyway.

She hadn’t gotten my attention yet, or pissed me off, her object.

“With a Black guy! I’m going to be gone all weekend!”

“Great, have fun,” I said, and I meant it. I should have asked her to take pics and show them to me. I was getting a lot out of this nonstop sex relationship. So she wants to take a vacation, hey, go for it, babe.

The more she couldn’t get a reaction out of me, the more pissed she got. I was a mystery, no ordinary man. I didn’t care if she cheated on me, just leave big megahelpings for me when you get back, honey.

Now, it’s obvious this chick did not get off on my brains. Here she was cuckolding me for some hulking Black brute with a double digit IQ and a monster dick.

Chicks dig brainy guys. Yeah right!

I would like to make some amendments to this rant. There are some women who like brains.

Asian chicks! Yo! Especially Chinese women. I’m convinced that the Chinese have been selecting for brains for a long time now. I did a lot of reading on China for a recent piece on the language. There were some interesting anecdotes.

One said that in a village in South China, there was a young man, the smartest guy in the whole village. All of the young women, especially the most beautiful, were lined up for him. They all wanted him. Why? He was the brainiest of them all! This suggests to me that maybe Chinese society has been selecting for brains. The women see the brainiest guys as the sexiest, or at least the best marriage potential. The best women compete for the brainiest guys. What’s the end result? 107 Chinese IQ! Good thinking, Chinese!

There was another anecdote. In central China, in a small village, they had a creative writing class. It was mostly full of women, as such classes always are. But there were a few guys. There was one guy, strong and silent, kept to himself, the best writer in the whole class! All the single Chinese women in the class wanted this guy! The best writer of them all!

Grab him, before someone else does. They hung around his office making fake excuses for being there and asking dumb questions. There was almost a line outside his door. He was also kind of macho for a Chinese guy, so that helps. But the main thing was, his writing kicked ass on everyone else’s. One Chinese woman snapped him up and was the envy of the rest.

I’ve also noticed this in Japanese and Thai women, but both of those cultures are heavily Sinicized.

Another exception: Jewish women! It’s true, Jewish chicks love brains. Being sexy and handsome are added attractions, but brains are definitely not a turnoff. I think it’s actually a sexual turn-on for Jewish women.

Once again, we have evidence for cultural evolution in selection for brains. In the traditional Jewish ghetto, the most beautiful young women were more or less auctioned off to the smartest young men. Say the rabbi had some daughters, really beautiful women. The hottest women in the village would hold out for the brainiest guy of them all.

The rabbi would virtually hold contests in Talmudic scholarship to see which boy was smartest, who would then be given the hot rabbi’s daughter babe in marriage. The smartest guys got the hottest chicks in the ghetto. This went on for centuries, and now you have Jews with average 113 IQ’s. Pretty smart cultural evolution there.

Hispanic/Iberian women. Not this pitiful excuse for an Hispanic culture here in the US, I mean the real deal in Latin America. Down there, especially in Peru, Brazil and Argentina, a scholar is a good thing to be. It’s widely accepted in society. There’s no such thing as scholarly nerds, since scholars conform to the same macho norms as everyone else. I’m not sure why, but hot young Latin American women like a brainy guy. Maybe he has good earning potential and is a good catch, maybe because scholars are highly valued in these Iberianized societies.

I also think that Iberian women have the same values. Spanish and Portuguese women seem to respect a smart guy. There’s a long tradition of valuing a scholar in these places. Iberian scholars were often macho, studly guys, highly respected by society, and they could get hot women.

French women. I suspect that French chicks like intellectuals more than your average European woman, but I’m not sure. Many French chicks are quite intellectual themselves, even ordinary working class women who you would never expect. It’s a very intellectual culture.

Cultures where the women do not value brains – this one is going to be hard. I would suggest right off the bat, the rest of Europe.

German women. Forget it. Even very smart German women want a caveman type, the dumber the better. Why this is, I have no idea.

Turkish women. I don’t think so. This is an extremely macho society, and the females conform strongly to macho norms. This is what they expect in a man.

Black women. Forget it. Of all women, Black women love the most masculine men of all – Black men! A lot of Black women think White guys period are wimpy, so you can imagine what they think of White intellectuals. It must be two thumbs down. This has got to be true for any Black society.

Some societies I am not sure about.

Russian women. No idea, but I suspect that they may respect intellectuals. Even ordinary IQ Russian women read Dostoevsky, listen to Tchaikovsky, etc. Intellectuals in Russia are not seen as effete. They are hardass, macho Russian dudes. They can get good women.

Arab women. I think Arab women are great (Check em out, guys!) but I’m not sure how they feel about intellectuals. Intellectuals are highly valued in Arab society, and they are macho, tough, Arab guys who conform to hypermasculine Arab values. They are well-respected by Arab society too – there’s nothing effete about working with your brain here in the land of dates and Crescents.

East Indian women. A commenter says they like smart guys, especially the middle class and up ones. I don’t know, because I have little experience with these women. We have a lot of Punjabis in my town though, and it’s striking how much they seem to respect education and an educated guy. It’s very highly valued. Further, many of them are either formally educated or if not, self-educated. Problem around here is that East Indian women are totally unavailable. They only go for Indian guys.

But anyway, in general, no! Your stratospheric IQ will not get you women, not in the US. It’s actually the opposite.